Literature DB >> 26740803

The Utility of Fisher's Geometric Model in Evolutionary Genetics.

O Tenaillon1.   

Abstract

The accumulation of data on the genomic bases of adaptation has triggered renewed interest in theoretical models of adaptation. Among these models, Fisher Geometric Model (FGM) has received a lot of attention over the last two decades. FGM is based on a continuous multidimensional phenotypic landscape, but it is for the emerging properties of individual mutation effects that it is mostly used. Despite an apparent simplicity and a limited number of parameters, FGM integrates a full model of mutation and epistatic interactions that allows the study of both beneficial and deleterious mutations, and subsequently the fate of evolving populations. In this review, I present the different properties of FGM and the qualitative and quantitative support they have received from experimental evolution data. I later discuss how to estimate the different parameters of the model and outline some future directions to connect FGM and the molecular determinants of adaptation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fisher’s Geometric model; adaptive landscape; distribution of fitness effects; drift load; epistasis; phenotypic complexity; pleiotropy; robustness

Year:  2014        PMID: 26740803      PMCID: PMC4699269          DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst        ISSN: 1543-592X            Impact factor:   13.915


  97 in total

1.  Pervasive compensatory adaptation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  F B Moore; D E Rozen; R E Lenski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  On the speed of Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  I Gordo; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Adaptation and the cost of complexity.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes.

Authors:  David C Krakauer; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects.

Authors:  C O Wilke; C Adami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Endosymbiotic bacteria: groEL buffers against deleterious mutations.

Authors:  Mario A Fares; Mario X Ruiz-González; Andrés Moya; Santiago F Elena; Eladio Barrio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Compensatory adaptation to the deleterious effect of antibiotic resistance in Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  Sophie Maisnier-Patin; Otto G Berg; Lars Liljas; Dan I Andersson
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6.

Authors:  C L Burch; L Chao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations.

Authors:  A Poon; S P Otto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  48 in total

1.  Collective Fluctuations in the Dynamics of Adaptation and Other Traveling Waves.

Authors:  Oskar Hallatschek; Lukas Geyrhofer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Fitness variation across subtle environmental perturbations reveals local modularity and global pleiotropy of adaptation.

Authors:  Grant Kinsler; Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Christian D Huber; Bernard Y Kim; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genotypic Complexity of Fisher's Geometric Model.

Authors:  Sungmin Hwang; Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The Nonstationary Dynamics of Fitness Distributions: Asexual Model with Epistasis and Standing Variation.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Lionel Roques
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Uneven Distribution of Mutational Variance Across the Transcriptome of Drosophila serrata Revealed by High-Dimensional Analysis of Gene Expression.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Daniel E Runcie; Katrina McGuigan; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Phenotypic lag and population extinction in the moving-optimum model: insights from a small-jumps limit.

Authors:  Michael Kopp; Elma Nassar; Etienne Pardoux
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Long-term evolution on complex fitness landscapes when mutation is weak.

Authors:  David M McCandlish
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 9.  Factors influencing the effect size distribution of adaptive substitutions.

Authors:  Emily L Dittmar; Christopher G Oakley; Jeffrey K Conner; Billie A Gould; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Minimum epistasis interpolation for sequence-function relationships.

Authors:  Juannan Zhou; David M McCandlish
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.