Literature DB >> 22623508

Saved by a log: how do humans perform hybrid visual and memory search?

Jeremy M Wolfe1.   

Abstract

Could you find 1 of your 1,000 Facebook friends in a crowd of 100? Even at a rate of 25 ms per comparison, determining that no friends were in the crowd would take more than 40 min if memory and visual search interacted linearly. In the experiment reported here, observers memorized pictures of 1 to 100 targets and then searched for any of these targets in visual displays of 1 to 16 objects. Response times varied linearly with visual set size but logarithmically with memory set size. Data from memory set sizes of 1 through 16 accurately predicted response times for different observers holding 100 objects in memory. The results would be consistent with a binary coding of visual objects in memory and are relevant to applied searches in which experts look for any of many items of interest (e.g., a radiologist running through a mental checklist of what might be wrong in a car-crash victim or an airport screener looking for any of a list of prohibited items in a carry-on bag).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22623508      PMCID: PMC3966104          DOI: 10.1177/0956797612443968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  15 in total

1.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Authors:  R HYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-03

2.  Setting up the target template in visual search.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Li-Wei King; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.

Authors:  G F Woodman; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

4.  Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time.

Authors:  Roos Houtkamp; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-07-30

5.  Practiced card sorting for multiple targets.

Authors:  U Neisser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-07

Review 6.  Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Judith Peters; Roos Houtkamp; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: an evaluative review.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; J T Townsend
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-05

9.  Response times with a memory-dependent decision task.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-11

10.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  59 in total

1.  Hybrid Search in Context: How to search for vegetables in the produce section and cereal in the cereal aisle.

Authors:  Sage E P Boettcher; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

2.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Michael Jigo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017).

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Age doesn't matter much: hybrid visual and memory search is preserved in older adults.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2019-05-03

8.  Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Incidental biasing of attention from visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Karla K Evans; Trafton Drew; Avigael Aizenman; Emilie Josephs
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.