Literature DB >> 11437304

Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.

G F Woodman1, E K Vogel, S J Luck.   

Abstract

Many theories of attention have proposed that visual working memory plays an important role in visual search tasks. The present study examined the involvement of visual working memory in search using a dual-task paradigm in which participants performed a visual search task while maintaining no, two, or four objects in visual working memory. The presence of a working memory load added a constant delay to the visual search reaction times, irrespective of the number of items in the visual search array. That is, there was no change in the slope of the function relating reaction time to the number of items in the search array, indicating that the search process itself was not slowed by the memory load. Moreover, the search task did not substantially impair the maintenance of information in visual working memory. These results suggest that visual search requires minimal visual working memory resources, a conclusion that is inconsistent with theories that propose a close link between attention and working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11437304     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  111 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Effect of target-distractor similarity on FEF visual selection in the absence of the target.

Authors:  Takashi R Sato; Katsumi Watanabe; Kirk G Thompson; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Search for multiple targets: evidence for memory-based control of attention.

Authors:  Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

6.  Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer; Mathew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

7.  Selection and consolidation of objects and actions.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-04-08

8.  Marking rejected distractors: a gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

9.  The role of working memory in attentional capture.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Jan De Fockert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

Review 10.  CNTRICS final task selection: control of attention.

Authors:  Keith H Nuechterlein; Steven J Luck; Cindy Lustig; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.