Literature DB >> 15831069

Setting up the target template in visual search.

Timothy J Vickery1, Li-Wei King, Yuhong Jiang.   

Abstract

Top-down knowledge about the target is essential in visual search. It biases visual attention to information that matches the target-defining criteria. Extensive research in the past has examined visual search when the target is defined by fixed criteria throughout the experiment, with few studies investigating how subjects set up the target. To address this issue, we conducted five experiments using random polygons and real-world objects, allowing the target criteria to change from trial to trial. On each trial, subjects first see a cue informing them about the target, followed 200-1000 ms later by the search array. We find that when the cue matches the target exactly, search speed increases and the slope of response time-set size function decreases. Deviations from the exact match in size or orientation slow down search speed, although they lead to faster speed compared with a neutral cue or a semantic cue. We conclude that the template set-up process uses detailed visual information, rather than schematic or semantic information, to find the target.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15831069     DOI: 10.1167/5.1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  79 in total

1.  Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Authors:  Alan R Pinkus; Miriam J Poteet; Allan J Pantle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.

Authors:  Alex Bahrami Balani; David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

3.  The role of working memory representations in the control of attention.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; David N Brunelli; Joshua Rubinstein; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Visual short-term memory guides infants' visual attention.

Authors:  Samantha G Mitsven; Lisa M Cantrell; Steven J Luck; Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-04-25

7.  The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Learning efficient visual search for stimuli containing diagnostic spatial configurations and color-shape conjunctions.

Authors:  Eric A Reavis; Sebastian M Frank; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Alexander Pollatsek; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

Review 10.  CNTRICS final task selection: control of attention.

Authors:  Keith H Nuechterlein; Steven J Luck; Cindy Lustig; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.