Literature DB >> 26656078

HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?

Jeremy M Wolfe1, Karla K Evans2, Trafton Drew3, Avigael Aizenman4, Emilie Josephs5.   

Abstract

Radiologists perform many 'visual search tasks' in which they look for one or more instances of one or more types of target item in a medical image (e.g. cancer screening). To understand and improve how radiologists do such tasks, it must be understood how the human 'search engine' works. This article briefly reviews some of the relevant work into this aspect of medical image perception. Questions include how attention and the eyes are guided in radiologic search? How is global (image-wide) information used in search? How might properties of human vision and human cognition lead to errors in radiologic search?
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26656078      PMCID： PMC4911962          DOI： 10.1093/rpd/ncv501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN： 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  50 in total

1.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

3.  Profiles in patient safety: misplaced femoral line guidewire and multiple failures to detect the foreign body on chest radiography.

Authors:  Timothy E Lum; Rollin J Fairbanks; Elliot C Pennington; Frank L Zwemer
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists' error rates in screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Rosemary H Tambouret; Andrew Evered; David C Wilbur; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Brian J Scholl; Erin R Clifford; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Visual search among items of different salience: removal of visual attention mimics a lesion in extrastriate area V4.

Authors:  J Braun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The gist of the abnormal: above-chance medical decision making in the blink of an eye.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Diane Georgian-Smith; Rosemary Tambouret; Robyn L Birdwell; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

8.  The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-04

9.  Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Michael J Van Wert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  If you don't find it often, you often don't find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Robyn L Birdwell; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240
View more
  15 in total

1.  Comparable prediction of breast cancer risk from a glimpse or a first impression of a mammogram.

Authors:  E M Raat; I Farr; J M Wolfe; K K Evans
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-11-06

2.  Melanoma in the Blink of an Eye: Pathologists' Rapid Detection, Classification, and Localization of Skin Abnormalities.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Trafton Drew; Manob Jyoti Saikia; Kathleen F Kerr; Megan M Eguchi; Annie C Lee; Caitlin May; David E Elder; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-06-16

Review 3.  The Holistic Processing Account of Visual Expertise in Medical Image Perception: A Review.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28

Review 4.  Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-25

5.  Strategic Eye Movements are Used to Support Object Authentication.

Authors:  Jane E Raymond; Scott P Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The invisible breast cancer: Experience does not protect against inattentional blindness to clinically relevant findings in radiology.

Authors:  Lauren Williams; Ann Carrigan; William Auffermann; Megan Mills; Anina Rich; Joann Elmore; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-11-02

Review 7.  Visual Illusions in Radiology: Untrue Perceptions in Medical Images and Their Implications for Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Fahd Yazdanie; Stephen Waite; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Srinivas Kolla; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Visual adaptation and the amplitude spectra of radiological images.

Authors:  Elysse Kompaniez-Dunigan; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-01-24

9.  Expertise, Automation and Trust in X-Ray Screening of Cabin Baggage.

Authors:  Alain Chavaillaz; Adrian Schwaninger; Stefan Michel; Juergen Sauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-14

10.  Using change detection to objectively evaluate whether novel over-the-counter drug labels can increase attention to critical health information among older adults.

Authors:  Alyssa L Harben; Deborah A Kashy; Shiva Esfahanian; Lanqing Liu; Laura Bix; Mark W Becker
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.