Literature DB >> 21665518

Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not.

Christian N L Olivers1, Judith Peters, Roos Houtkamp, Pieter R Roelfsema.   

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed a strong relationship between visual working memory and selective attention, such that attention is biased by what is currently on our mind. However, other data show that not all memorized items influence the deployment of attention, thus calling for a distinction within working memory: whereas active memory items function as an attentional template and directly affect perception, other, accessory items do not. We review recent evidence that items compete for the status of 'attentional template' that contains only one object at a time. Neurophysiological results provide insight into these different memory states by revealing a more intricate organization of working memory than was previously thought.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665518     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  195 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

3.  How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-12

4.  Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Mathilde M Ooi; Tobias Egner; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: from passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Styrmir Saevarsson; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

10.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.