Literature DB >> 28733839

Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors.

Taosheng Liu1,2, Michael Jigo3.   

Abstract

Attention to a feature enhances the sensory representation of that feature. Although much has been learned about the properties of attentional modulation when attending to a single feature, the effectiveness of attending to multiple features is not well understood. We investigated this question in a series of experiments using a color-detection task while varying the number of attended colors in a cueing paradigm. Observers were shown either a single cue, two cues, or no cue (baseline) before detecting a coherent color target. We measured detection threshold by varying the coherence level of the target. Compared to the baseline condition, we found consistent facilitation of detection performance in the one-cue and two-cue conditions, but performance in the two-cue condition was lower than that in the one-cue condition. In the final experiment, we presented a 50% valid cue to emulate the situation in which observers were only able to attend a single color in the two-cue condition, and found equivalent detection thresholds with the standard two-cue condition. These results indicate a limit in attending to two colors and further imply that observers could effectively attend a single color at a time. Such a limit is likely due to an inability to maintain multiple active attentional templates for colors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capacity; Color; Feature; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28733839      PMCID: PMC5664215          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1390-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  48 in total

1.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

4.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Multiple attentional control settings influence late attentional selection but do not provide an early attentional filter.

Authors:  Maha Adamo; Carson Pun; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.065

6.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.

Authors:  B C Motter; E J Belky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Global feature-based attention to orientation.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Youyang Hou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  An inability to set independent attentional control settings by hemifield.

Authors:  Mark W Becker; Susan M Ravizza; Chad Peltier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Feature-based attention enhances performance by increasing response gain.

Authors:  Katrin Herrmann; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Melissa Saenz; Giedrius T Buracas; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  8 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects.

Authors:  Christian Büsel; Martin Voracek; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-31

2.  Beta and Theta Oscillations Differentially Support Free Versus Forced Control over Multiple-Target Search.

Authors:  Joram van Driel; Eduard Ort; Johannes J Fahrenfort; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  In search of exogenous feature-based attention.

Authors:  Ian Donovan; Ying Joey Zhou; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Feature-based attention: effects and control.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-23

5.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Humans can efficiently look for but not select multiple visual objects.

Authors:  Eduard Ort; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort; Tuomas Ten Cate; Martin Eimer; Christian Nl Olivers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Reward differentially interacts with physical salience in feature-based attention.

Authors:  Mengyuan Gong; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Differential impact of exogenous and endogenous attention on the contrast sensitivity function across eccentricity.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.