Literature DB >> 22621968

Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Yada Treesukosol1, Alan C Spector.   

Abstract

Evidence in the literature supports the hypothesis that the T1R2+3 heterodimer binds to compounds that humans describe as sweet. Here, we assessed the necessity of the T1R2 and T1R3 subunits in the maintenance of normal taste sensitivity to carbohydrate stimuli. We trained and tested water-restricted T1R2 knockout (KO), T1R3 KO and their wild-type (WT) same-sex littermate controls in a two-response operant procedure to sample a fluid and differentially respond on the basis of whether the stimulus was water or a tastant. Correct responses were reinforced with water and incorrect responses were punished with a time-out. Testing was conducted with a modified descending method of limits procedure across daily 25-min sessions. Both KO groups displayed severely impaired performance and markedly decreased sensitivity when required to discriminate water from sucrose, glucose, or maltose. In contrast, when Polycose was tested, KO mice had normal EC(50) values for their psychometric functions, with some slight, but significant, impairment in performance. Sensitivity to NaCl did not differ between these mice and their WT controls. Our findings support the view that the T1R2+3 heterodimer is the principal receptor that mediates taste detection of natural sweeteners, but not of all carbohydrate stimuli. The combined presence of T1R2 and T1R3 appears unnecessary for the maintenance of relatively normal sensitivity to Polycose, at least in this task. Some detectability of sugars at high concentrations might be mediated by the putative polysaccharide taste receptor, the remaining T1R subunit forming either a homodimer or heteromer with another protein(s), or nontaste orosensory cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22621968      PMCID: PMC3404635          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00089.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  68 in total

1.  ACTIVITY CONTOUR MAPS AS RELATED TO PREFERENCE IN FOUR GUSTATORY STIMULUS AREAS OF THE RAT.

Authors:  P T YOUNG; C L TRAFTON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-08

2.  Putative mammalian taste receptors: a class of taste-specific GPCRs with distinct topographic selectivity.

Authors:  M A Hoon; E Adler; J Lindemeier; J F Battey; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-02-19       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Drinking spout orifice size affects licking behavior in inbred mice.

Authors:  Cedrick D Dotson; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-08-07

4.  The effectiveness of some sugars in stimulating licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  J D Davis
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1973-07

5.  Taste intensity as a function of area and concentration: differentiation between compounds.

Authors:  D V Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-02

6.  Lactisole interacts with the transmembrane domains of human T1R3 to inhibit sweet taste.

Authors:  Peihua Jiang; Meng Cui; Baohua Zhao; Zhan Liu; Lenore A Snyder; Lumie M J Benard; Roman Osman; Robert F Margolskee; Marianna Max
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Taste aversion to sugars by the gerbil.

Authors:  W Jakinovich
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-06

8.  Specificity of acquired aversions to taste qualities in hamsters and rats.

Authors:  G H Nowlis; M E Frank; C Pfaffmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1980-10

9.  Sham feeding as a procedure for assessing the influence of diet palatability on food intake.

Authors:  H P Weingarten; S D Watson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-03

10.  The cysteine-rich region of T1R3 determines responses to intensely sweet proteins.

Authors:  Peihua Jiang; Qingzhou Ji; Zhan Liu; Lenore A Snyder; Lumie M J Benard; Robert F Margolskee; Marianna Max
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  28 in total

1.  Perceptual and neural responses to sweet taste in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Cross-Generalization Profile to Orosensory Stimuli of Rats Conditioned to Avoid a High Fat/High Sugar Diet.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  A new gustometer for taste testing in rodents.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Ginger D Blonde; Ross P Henderson; Yada Treesukosol; Paul Hendrick; Ryan Newsome; Fred H Fletcher; Te Tang; James A Donaldson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Influence of stimulus and oral adaptation temperature on gustatory responses in central taste-sensitive neurons.

Authors:  Jinrong Li; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  An Examination of the Role of L-Glutamate and Inosine 5'-Monophosphate in Hedonic Taste-Guided Behavior by Mice Lacking the T1R1 + T1R3 Receptor.

Authors:  Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  T1R2+T1R3-independent chemosensory inputs contributing to behavioral discrimination of sugars in mice.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto; Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Ingestion of bacterial lipopolysaccharide inhibits peripheral taste responses to sucrose in mice.

Authors:  X Zhu; L He; L P McCluskey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

10.  Gustatory stimuli representing different perceptual qualities elicit distinct patterns of neuropeptide secretion from taste buds.

Authors:  Maartje C P Geraedts; Steven D Munger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.