Literature DB >> 30624973

T1R2+T1R3-independent chemosensory inputs contributing to behavioral discrimination of sugars in mice.

Lindsey A Schier1, Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto2,3, Ginger D Blonde3, Alan C Spector3.   

Abstract

Simple sugars are thought to elicit a unitary sensation, principally via the "sweet" taste receptor type 1 taste receptor (T1R)2+T1R3, yet we previously found that rats with experience consuming two metabolically distinct sugars, glucose and fructose, subsequently licked more for glucose than fructose, even when postingestive influences were abated. The results pointed to the existence of an orosensory receptor that binds one sugar but not the other and whose signal is channeled into neural circuits that motivate ingestion. Here we sought to determine the chemosensory nature of this signal. First, we assessed whether T1R2 and/or T1R3 are necessary to acquire this behavioral discrimination, replicating our rat study in T1R2+T1R3 double-knockout (KO) mice and their wild-type counterparts as well as in two common mouse strains that vary in their sensitivity to sweeteners [C57BL/6 (B6) and 129X1/SvJ (129)]. These studies showed that extensive exposure to multiple concentrations of glucose and fructose in daily one-bottle 30-min sessions enhanced lick responses for glucose over fructose in brief-access tests. This was true even for KO mice that lacked the canonical "sweet" taste receptor. Surgical disconnection of olfactory inputs to the forebrain (bulbotomy) in B6 mice severely disrupted the ability to express this experience-dependent sugar discrimination. Importantly, these bulbotomized B6 mice exhibited severely blunted responsiveness to both sugars relative to water in brief-access lick tests, despite the fact that they have intact T1R2+T1R3 receptors. The results highlight the importance of other sources of chemosensory and postingestive inputs in shaping and maintaining "hardwired" responses to sugar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  food learning; gustatory system; ingestive motivation; olfactory input; postingestive feedback

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30624973      PMCID: PMC6589602          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00255.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  51 in total

1.  An in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging study of the olfactory bulbectomized rat model of depression.

Authors:  A S Wrynn; C P Mac Sweeney; F Franconi; L Lemaire; D Pouliquen; S Herlidou; B E Leonard; J Gandon; J D de Certaines
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  T1R3 is expressed in brush cells and ghrelin-producing cells of murine stomach.

Authors:  Nicole Hass; Karin Schwarzenbacher; Heinz Breer
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  A candidate taste receptor gene near a sweet taste locus.

Authors:  J P Montmayeur; S D Liberles; H Matsunami; L B Buck
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Whole nerve chorda tympani responses to sweeteners in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  M Inoue; S A McCaughey; A A Bachmanov; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Positional cloning of the mouse saccharin preference (Sac) locus.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; X Li; D R Reed; J D Ohmen; S Li; Z Chen; M G Tordoff; P J de Jong; C Wu; D B West; A Chatterjee; D A Ross; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Philippe Marambaud; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-12-31

8.  Metabolic adaptations of three inbred strains of mice (C57BL/6, DBA/2, and 129T2) in response to a high-fat diet.

Authors:  Alexandra Funkat; Christine M Massa; Valentina Jovanovska; Joseph Proietto; Sofianos Andrikopoulos
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Sugar-induced cephalic-phase insulin release is mediated by a T1r2+T1r3-independent taste transduction pathway in mice.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Sarah Stano; Marlena Holter; Tali Azenkot; Olivia Goldman; Robert F Margolskee; Joseph R Vasselli; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.619

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mixtures of Sweeteners and Maltodextrin Enhance Flavor and Intake of Alcohol in Adolescent Rats.

Authors:  Alice Sardarian; Sophia Liu; Steven L Youngentob; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Electrophysiological responses to sugars and amino acids in the nucleus of the solitary tract of type 1 taste receptor double-knockout mice.

Authors:  B Kalyanasundar; Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector; Susan P Travers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5 Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-05-15

4.  Tasting temperature: neural and behavioral responses to thermal stimulation of oral mucosa.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2021-01-13

5.  The Role of Post-Ingestive Feedback in the Development of an Enhanced Appetite for the Orosensory Properties of Glucose over Fructose in Rats.

Authors:  Kevin P Myers; Megan Y Summers; Elizabeth Geyer-Roberts; Lindsey A Schier
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Neural Isolation of the Olfactory Bulbs Severely Impairs Taste-Guided Behavior to Normally Preferred, But Not Avoided, Stimuli.

Authors:  Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto; Ginger D Blonde; Fabienne Schmid; Lauren Mariotti; Matias Campora; Tadashi Inui; Lindsey A Schier; Alan C Spector
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.