Literature DB >> 27526998

Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Karen Ackroff1, Anthony Sclafani2.   

Abstract

Mice are attracted to the tastes of sugar and maltodextrin solutions. Sugar taste is mediated by the T1R2/T1R3 sweet taste receptor, while maltodextrin taste is dependent upon a different as yet unidentified receptor. In a prior study sweet-sensitive C57BL/6J (B6) mice displayed similar preferences for sucrose and maltodextrin solutions in 24-h saccharide vs. water choice tests that exceeded those of sweet-subsensitive 129P3/J (129) mice. In a subsequent experiment reported here, sucrose and maltodextrin (Polycose) preference and acceptance were compared in the two strains in saccharide vs. saccharide choice tests with isocaloric concentrations (0.5-32%). The 129 mice displayed significantly greater maltodextrin preferences than B6 mice at mid-range concentrations (2-8%), while the mice displayed an opposite preference profile at the highest concentration (32%). As in prior studies, 129 mice consumed less total saccharide than B6 mice at lower concentrations. These findings show that the conclusions reached from tastant vs. water tests may differ from those pitting one tastant against another. The increased sucrose preference and intake of B6 mice, relative to 129 mice, is consistent with their sweet-sensitive phenotype.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Polysaccharide taste; Post-oral conditioning; Sweet taste

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27526998      PMCID: PMC5028306          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  44 in total

1.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Alexander Pinhas; Michael Aviel; Michael Koen; Simon Gurgov; Vanessa Acosta; Michael Israel; Leonid Kakuriev; Elena Guskova; Isabelle Fuzailov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-14

3.  Contribution of alpha-gustducin to taste-guided licking responses of mice.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Lauren D Bloom; Maika Onishi; Kun Hao Zheng; Sami Damak; Robert F Margolskee; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.

Authors:  J W Nissenbaum; A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Sex differences in polysaccharide and sugar preferences in rats.

Authors:  A Sclafani; H Hertwig; M Vigorito; M B Feigin
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Hedonic response of rats to polysaccharide and sugar solutions.

Authors:  A Sclafani; A E Clyne
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Influence of saccharide length on polysaccharide appetite in the rat.

Authors:  A Sclafani; H Hertwig; M Vigorito; H Sloan; B Kerzner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-03-10

9.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Qualitative discrimination of gustatory stimuli in three different strains of mice.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; T Higashi; H Katsukawa; T Mizukoshi; M Funakoshi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-11-19       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of Sucrose on Cisplatin-induced Fatigue-like Behavior in Mice: Comparison With Fructose and Glucose.

Authors:  Kazumi Yoshizawa; Ruka Kurono; Haruka Sato; Erika Ishijima; Haruka Nasu; Nurfarhana Ferdaos; Hidetaka Suzuki; Kenichi Negishi
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-05-03

2.  Profound differences in fat versus carbohydrate preferences in CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice: Role of fat taste.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-06-19

3.  Detection of maltodextrin and its discrimination from sucrose are independent of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer.

Authors:  Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Evidence supporting oral sensitivity to complex carbohydrates independent of sweet taste sensitivity in humans.

Authors:  Julia Y Q Low; Kathleen E Lacy; Robert L McBride; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.