Literature DB >> 16083923

Drinking spout orifice size affects licking behavior in inbred mice.

Cedrick D Dotson1, Alan C Spector.   

Abstract

Using a lickometer, we assessed the effect of drinking spout orifice size on the licking behavior of inbred mice [C57BL/6J, SWR/J, 129P3/J and DBA/2J]. Animals licked from drinking spout sipper tubes that had what were defined as either a large (2.7 mm) or a small (1.5 mm) orifice. Mice took approximately twice as many licks from a stationary single small orifice drinking spout than when licking from a spout with a large orifice during separate 30-min sessions. However, their total intake volume was approximately the same. We calculated that mice received a mean of 0.55 muL per lick from the drinking tubes with a small orifice and a mean of 1.15 muL per lick from the drinking tubes with a large orifice. Thus, the animals appear to have regulated their fluid intake by proportionally adjusting their licking as a function of the lick volume. On average, this regulation occurred through modulation of the size of licking bursts and not their frequency. However, strain differences in compensation strategy were observed. When licking was restricted to a series of 5-s trials in a 30-min brief access test session, the smaller orifice size increased the range of responsiveness that was expressed. Mice increased their average licks per trial by 20% and took 60% more trials when licking from a spout with a small orifice. Interestingly, when the orifice size was quasi-randomly varied within a brief access session, licking was greater from large orifice drinking spouts, suggesting that water delivered from the two orifice sizes differs in its reinforcement efficacy. These findings demonstrate that drinking spout orifice size can significantly influence experimental outcomes in licking tests involving mice and care should be taken in controlling this variable in testing the effects of taste or other factors on ingestive behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16083923     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  15 in total

1.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Genetic control of oromotor phenotypes: A survey of licking and ingestive behaviors in highly diverse strains of mice.

Authors:  Steven J St John; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams; Jennifer Saputra; John D Boughter
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-04-12

3.  Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades.

Authors:  Douglas Wahlsten; Alexander Bachmanov; Deborah A Finn; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Toward a mouse neuroethology in the laboratory environment.

Authors:  Anthony M Oliva; Ernesto Salcedo; Jennifer L Hellier; Xuan Ly; Kanthaiah Koka; Daniel J Tollin; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The fine temporal structure of the rat licking pattern: what causes the variabiliy in the interlick intervals and how is it affected by the drinking solution?

Authors:  Xiong Bin Lin; Dwight R Pierce; Kim Edward Light; Abdallah Hayar
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Is glycine "sweet" to mice? Mouse strain differences in perception of glycine taste.

Authors:  Satoshi Manita; Alexander A Bachmanov; Xia Li; Gary K Beauchamp; Masashi Inoue
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Modulation of taste responsiveness by the satiation hormone peptide YY.

Authors:  Michael S La Sala; Maria D Hurtado; Alicia R Brown; Diego V Bohórquez; Rodger A Liddle; Herbert Herzog; Sergei Zolotukhin; Cedrick D Dotson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice.

Authors:  A W Johnson; A Sherwood; D R Smith; M Wosiski-Kuhn; M Gallagher; P C Holland
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Reduced oral ethanol avoidance in mice lacking transient receptor potential channel vanilloid receptor 1.

Authors:  Jarrod M Ellingson; Bryant C Silbaugh; Susan M Brasser
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Variation in nicotine consumption in inbred mice is not linked to orosensory ability.

Authors:  A Rebecca Glatt; Kelley Denton; John D Boughter
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.