Literature DB >> 28158517

CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Anthony Sclafani1, Austin S Vural1, Karen Ackroff1.   

Abstract

A recent study indicated that CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice differ in their taste preferences for maltodextrin but display similar sucrose preferences. The present study revealed strain differences in preferences for the constituent sugars of sucrose. Whereas B6 mice preferred 8% glucose to 8% fructose in 2-day tests, the CAST mice preferred fructose to glucose. These preferences emerged with repeated testing which suggested post-oral influences. In a second experiment, 2-day choice tests were conducted with the sugars versus a sucralose + saccharin (SS) mixture which is highly preferred in brief access tests. B6 mice strongly preferred glucose but not fructose to the non-nutritive SS whereas CAST mice preferred SS to both glucose and fructose even when food restricted. This implied that CAST mice are insensitive to the postoral appetite stimulating actions of the 2 sugars. A third experiment revealed, however, that intragastric glucose and fructose infusions conditioned significant but mild flavor preferences in CAST mice, whereas in B6 mice glucose conditioned a robust preference but fructose was ineffective. Thus, unlike other mouse strains and rats, glucose is not more reinforcing than fructose in CAST mice. Their oral preference for fructose over glucose may be related to a subsensitive maltodextrin receptor or glucose-specific receptor which is stimulated by glucose but not fructose. The failure of CAST mice to prefer glucose to a non-nutritive sweetener distinguishes this strain from other mouse strains and rats.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flavor conditioning; fructose; glucose; saccharin; strain differences; sucralose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28158517      PMCID: PMC6075621          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjx003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  37 in total

Review 1.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 3.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Taste-independent detection of the caloric content of sugar in Drosophila.

Authors:  Monica Dus; SooHong Min; Alex C Keene; Ga Young Lee; Greg S B Suh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.

Authors:  J W Nissenbaum; A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Dissociation of palatability and calorie effects in learned flavor preferences.

Authors:  Z S Warwick; H P Weingarten
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1994-03

8.  Experience-dependent escalation of glucose drinking and the development of glucose preference over fructose - association with glucose entry into the brain.

Authors:  Ken T Wakabayashi; Laurence Spekterman; Eugene A Kiyatkin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Raul R Gainetdinov; Marc G Caron; Miguel A L Nicolelis; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  4 in total

1.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 2.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

3.  Profound differences in fat versus carbohydrate preferences in CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice: Role of fat taste.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-06-19

4.  Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5 Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-05-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.