Literature DB >> 22616092

Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context.

Arthi G Srinivasan1, Robert V Shannon, David M Landsberger.   

Abstract

Improving spectral resolution in cochlear implants is key to improving performance in difficult listening conditions (e.g. speech in noise, music, etc.). Current focusing might reduce channel interaction, thereby increasing spectral resolution. Previous studies have shown that combining current steering and current focusing reduces spread of excitation and improves virtual channel discrimination in a single-channel context. It is unclear whether the single-channel benefits from current focusing extend to a multi-channel context, in which the physical and perceptual interference of multiple stimulated channels might overwhelm the benefits of improved spectral resolution. In this study, signal discrimination was measured with and without current focusing, in the presence of competing stimuli on nearby electrodes. Results showed that signal discrimination was consistently better with current focusing than without, regardless of the amplitude of the competing stimuli. Therefore, combining current steering and current focusing may provide more effective spectral cues than are currently available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22616092      PMCID: PMC3564555          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  42 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  P C Loizou; O Poroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J J Briaire; J H Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Marilyn E Demorest
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Qian-Jie Fu; John Galvin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2004-05

9.  Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: the role of spectral and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; Geraldine Nogaki; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  13 in total

1.  Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Victor H Hernandez; Anna Gehrt; Zhizi Jing; Gerhard Hoch; Marcus Jeschke; Nicola Strenzke; Tobias Moser
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; Monica Padilla; Robert V Shannon; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Victor H Hernandez; Anna Gehrt; Kirsten Reuter; Zhizi Jing; Marcus Jeschke; Alejandro Mendoza Schulz; Gerhard Hoch; Matthias Bartels; Gerhard Vogt; Carolyn W Garnham; Hiromu Yawo; Yugo Fukazawa; George J Augustine; Ernst Bamberg; Sebastian Kügler; Tim Salditt; Livia de Hoz; Nicola Strenzke; Tobias Moser
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

Review 7.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Julia Stelmach; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.