Literature DB >> 10978822

Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

J J Briaire1, J H Frijns.   

Abstract

Despite the fact that cochlear implants are widely and successfully used in clinical practice, relatively little is known to date about the electric field patterns they set up in the cochlea. Based upon the available measurements and modelling results, the scala tympani is usually considered to be a preferential current pathway that acts like a leaky transmission line. Therefore, most authors assume the current thresholds to decay exponentially along the length of the scala tympani. Here we present potential distributions calculated with a fully three-dimensional, spiralling volume conduction model of the guinea pig cochlea, and try to identify its preferential current pathways. The relatively well conducting scala tympani turns out to be the main one indeed, but the exponential decay (J approximately e(-z)) of current is only a good description of the far-field behaviour. In the vicinity of the electrodes, i.e. near the fibres that are most easily excited, higher current densities are found, that are best described by a spherical spread of the current (J approximately 1/R(2)). The results are compared with those obtained with a variant of our previous, rotationally symmetric, model and with measurements in the literature. The implications of the findings are discussed in the light of simulated neural responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10978822     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00104-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  28 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

4.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Non-uniform distribution of outer hair cell transmembrane potential induced by extracellular electric field.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Teresa M Wilson; Tao Wu; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jorien Snel-Bongers; Jeroen J Briaire; Erika H van der Veen; Randy K Kalkman; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-22

8.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mohamed Bingabr; Blas Espinoza-Varas; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.