Literature DB >> 22566067

Genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks.

J M González-Camacho1, G de Los Campos, P Pérez, D Gianola, J E Cairns, G Mahuku, R Babu, J Crossa.   

Abstract

The availability of high density panels of molecular markers has prompted the adoption of genomic selection (GS) methods in animal and plant breeding. In GS, parametric, semi-parametric and non-parametric regressions models are used for predicting quantitative traits. This article shows how to use neural networks with radial basis functions (RBFs) for prediction with dense molecular markers. We illustrate the use of the linear Bayesian LASSO regression model and of two non-linear regression models, reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) regression and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN) on simulated data and real maize lines genotyped with 55,000 markers and evaluated for several trait-environment combinations. The empirical results of this study indicated that the three models showed similar overall prediction accuracy, with a slight and consistent superiority of RKHS and RBFNN over the additive Bayesian LASSO model. Results from the simulated data indicate that RKHS and RBFNN models captured epistatic effects; however, adding non-signal (redundant) predictors (interaction between markers) can adversely affect the predictive accuracy of the non-linear regression models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22566067      PMCID: PMC3405257          DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1868-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  16 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A penalized maximum likelihood method for estimating epistatic effects of QTL.

Authors:  Y-M Zhang; S Xu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression: a general framework for genetic evaluation.

Authors:  G de Los Campos; D Gianola; G J M Rosa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Reproducing kernel hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Johannes B C H M van Kaam
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Marker-assisted prediction of non-additive genetic values.

Authors:  Nanye Long; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Universal Approximation Using Radial-Basis-Function Networks.

Authors:  J Park; I W Sandberg
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Predicting complex quantitative traits with Bayesian neural networks: a case study with Jersey cows and wheat.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Hayrettin Okut; Kent A Weigel; Guilherme Jm Rosa
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 10.  Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits.

Authors:  William G Hill; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  64 in total

1.  Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population.

Authors:  Sang He; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Vilson Mirdita; Yusheng Zhao; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits with epistatic effects in plant breeding populations.

Authors:  D Wang; I Salah El-Basyoni; P Stephen Baenziger; J Crossa; K M Eskridge; I Dweikat
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Priors in whole-genome regression: the bayesian alphabet returns.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Deep Kernel and Deep Learning for Genome-Based Prediction of Single Traits in Multienvironment Breeding Trials.

Authors:  José Crossa; Johannes W R Martini; Daniel Gianola; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Diego Jarquin; Philomin Juliana; Osval Montesinos-López; Jaime Cuevas
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Exploring the areas of applicability of whole-genome prediction methods for Asian rice (Oryza sativa L.).

Authors:  Akio Onogi; Osamu Ideta; Yuto Inoshita; Kaworu Ebana; Takuma Yoshioka; Masanori Yamasaki; Hiroyoshi Iwata
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  Genomic-based-breeding tools for tropical maize improvement.

Authors:  Thammineni Chakradhar; Vemuri Hindu; Palakolanu Sudhakar Reddy
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Can Deep Learning Improve Genomic Prediction of Complex Human Traits?

Authors:  Pau Bellot; Gustavo de Los Campos; Miguel Pérez-Enciso
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A directed learning strategy integrating multiple omic data improves genomic prediction.

Authors:  Xuehai Hu; Weibo Xie; Chengchao Wu; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray; Jian Yang; Ben J Hayes; Alkes L Price; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  An experimental approach for estimating the genomic selection advantage for Fusarium head blight and Septoria tritici blotch in winter wheat.

Authors:  Cathérine Pauline Herter; Erhard Ebmeyer; Sonja Kollers; Viktor Korzun; Thomas Miedaner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.