Literature DB >> 30171033

Can Deep Learning Improve Genomic Prediction of Complex Human Traits?

Pau Bellot1, Gustavo de Los Campos2,3, Miguel Pérez-Enciso4,5.   

Abstract

The genetic analysis of complex traits does not escape the current excitement around artificial intelligence, including a renewed interest in "deep learning" (DL) techniques such as Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). However, the performance of DL for genomic prediction of complex human traits has not been comprehensively tested. To provide an evaluation of MLPs and CNNs, we used data from distantly related white Caucasian individuals (n ∼100k individuals, m ∼500k SNPs, and k = 1000) of the interim release of the UK Biobank. We analyzed a total of five phenotypes: height, bone heel mineral density, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and waist-hip ratio, with genomic heritabilities ranging from ∼0.20 to 0.70. After hyperparameter optimization using a genetic algorithm, we considered several configurations, from shallow to deep learners, and compared the predictive performance of MLPs and CNNs with that of Bayesian linear regressions across sets of SNPs (from 10k to 50k) that were preselected using single-marker regression analyses. For height, a highly heritable phenotype, all methods performed similarly, although CNNs were slightly but consistently worse. For the rest of the phenotypes, the performance of some CNNs was comparable or slightly better than linear methods. Performance of MLPs was highly dependent on SNP set and phenotype. In all, over the range of traits evaluated in this study, CNN performance was competitive to linear models, but we did not find any case where DL outperformed the linear model by a sizable margin. We suggest that more research is needed to adapt CNN methodology, originally motivated by image analysis, to genetic-based problems in order for CNNs to be competitive with linear models.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional Neural Networks; GenPred; Genomic Prediction regressions; Multilayer Perceptrons; UK Biobank; complex traits; deep learning; genomic prediction; whole-genome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30171033      PMCID: PMC6218236          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  BOOST: A fast approach to detecting gene-gene interactions in genome-wide case-control studies.

Authors:  Xiang Wan; Can Yang; Qiang Yang; Hong Xue; Xiaodan Fan; Nelson L S Tang; Weichuan Yu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability.

Authors:  Brendan Maher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Luis Varona; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Prediction of body mass index in mice using dense molecular markers and a regularized neural network.

Authors:  Hayrettin Okut; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Estimating missing heritability for disease from genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Sang Hong Lee; Naomi R Wray; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8.  Progress and promise of genome-wide association studies for human complex trait genetics.

Authors:  Barbara E Stranger; Eli A Stahl; Towfique Raj
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets.

Authors:  Christopher C Chang; Carson C Chow; Laurent Cam Tellier; Shashaank Vattikuti; Shaun M Purcell; James J Lee
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  Genome-enabled prediction using probabilistic neural network classifiers.

Authors:  Juan Manuel González-Camacho; José Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Leonardo Ornella; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Statistical learning approaches in the genetic epidemiology of complex diseases.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Marvin N Wright; Sabine Hoffmann; Inke R König
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Deep neural network improves the estimation of polygenic risk scores for breast cancer.

Authors:  Adrien Badré; Li Zhang; Wellington Muchero; Justin C Reynolds; Chongle Pan
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Can artificial neural replicators be useful for studying RNA replicators?

Authors:  Alexandr A Ezhov
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 4.  Evolutionary perspectives on polygenic selection, missing heritability, and GWAS.

Authors:  Lawrence H Uricchio
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Genome-wide prediction for complex traits under the presence of dominance effects in simulated populations using GBLUP and machine learning methods.

Authors:  Anderson Antonio Carvalho Alves; Rebeka Magalhães da Costa; Tiago Bresolin; Gerardo Alves Fernandes Júnior; Rafael Espigolan; André Mauric Frossard Ribeiro; Roberto Carvalheiro; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The Artificial Intelligence Doctor: Considerations for the Clinical Implementation of Ethical AI.

Authors:  Julius M Kernbach; Karlijn Hakvoort; Jonas Ort; Hans Clusmann; Georg Neuloh; Daniel Delev
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

7.  Multi-scale inference of genetic trait architecture using biologically annotated neural networks.

Authors:  Pinar Demetci; Wei Cheng; Gregory Darnell; Xiang Zhou; Sohini Ramachandran; Lorin Crawford
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Genetic prediction of complex traits with polygenic scores: a statistical review.

Authors:  Ying Ma; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 9.  Parsing the Functional Impact of Noncoding Genetic Variants in the Brain Epigenome.

Authors:  Samuel K Powell; Callan O'Shea; Kristen J Brennand; Schahram Akbarian
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Automated Machine Learning: A Case Study of Genomic "Image-Based" Prediction in Maize Hybrids.

Authors:  Giovanni Galli; Felipe Sabadin; Rafael Massahiro Yassue; Cassia Galves; Humberto Fanelli Carvalho; Jose Crossa; Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.