Literature DB >> 21674154

Marker-assisted prediction of non-additive genetic values.

Nanye Long1, Daniel Gianola, Guilherme J M Rosa, Kent A Weigel.   

Abstract

It has become increasingly clear from systems biology arguments that interaction and non-linearity play an important role in genetic regulation of phenotypic variation for complex traits. Marker-assisted prediction of genetic values assuming additive gene action has been widely investigated because of its relevance in artificial selection. On the other hand, it has been less well-studied when non-additive effects hold. Here, we explored a nonparametric model, radial basis function (RBF) regression, for predicting quantitative traits under different gene action modes (additivity, dominance and epistasis). Using simulation, it was found that RBF had better ability (higher predictive correlations and lower predictive mean square errors) of predicting merit of individuals in future generations in the presence of non-additive effects than a linear additive model, the Bayesian Lasso. This was true for populations undergoing either directional or random selection over several generations. Under additive gene action, RBF was slightly worse than the Bayesian Lasso. While prediction of genetic values under additive gene action is well handled by a variety of parametric models, nonparametric RBF regression is a useful counterpart for dealing with situations where non-additive gene action is suspected, and it is robust irrespective of mode of gene action.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21674154     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-011-9588-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  29 in total

1.  Prediction of parental dominance combinations for planned matings, methodology, and simulation results.

Authors:  L Varona; I Misztal
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Non-additive genetic effects in animal selection.

Authors:  M Łukaszewicz
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Modifying the Schwarz Bayesian information criterion to locate multiple interacting quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Malgorzata Bogdan; Jayanta K Ghosh; R W Doerge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.

Authors:  Gustavo De los Campos; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel; José Crossa
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  The effect of non-additive genetic interactions on selection in multi-locus genetic models.

Authors:  J Hallander; P Waldmann
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Epistasis and the release of genetic variation during long-term selection.

Authors:  Orjan Carlborg; Lina Jacobsson; Per Ahgren; Paul Siegel; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  A comprehensive review of genetic association studies.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Kirk Lohmueller; Edward Byrne; Kurt Hirschhorn
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping.

Authors:  Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 10.  Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits.

Authors:  William G Hill; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  14 in total

1.  Genome-wide prediction for complex traits under the presence of dominance effects in simulated populations using GBLUP and machine learning methods.

Authors:  Anderson Antonio Carvalho Alves; Rebeka Magalhães da Costa; Tiago Bresolin; Gerardo Alves Fernandes Júnior; Rafael Espigolan; André Mauric Frossard Ribeiro; Roberto Carvalheiro; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks.

Authors:  J M González-Camacho; G de Los Campos; P Pérez; D Gianola; J E Cairns; G Mahuku; R Babu; J Crossa
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Accounting for genetic architecture improves sequence based genomic prediction for a Drosophila fitness trait.

Authors:  Ulrike Ober; Wen Huang; Michael Magwire; Martin Schlather; Henner Simianer; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Kernel-based variance component estimation and whole-genome prediction of pre-corrected phenotypes and progeny tests for dairy cow health traits.

Authors:  Gota Morota; Prashanth Boddhireddy; Natascha Vukasinovic; Daniel Gianola; Sue Denise
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits in chickens using genomic annotation.

Authors:  Gota Morota; Rostam Abdollahi-Arpanahi; Andreas Kranis; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Persistency of Prediction Accuracy and Genetic Gain in Synthetic Populations Under Recurrent Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Pascal Schopp; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Effect of regulatory architecture on broad versus narrow sense heritability.

Authors:  Yunpeng Wang; Jon Olav Vik; Stig W Omholt; Arne B Gjuvsland
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Enhancing genome-enabled prediction by bagging genomic BLUP.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Kent A Weigel; Nicole Krämer; Alessandra Stella; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.