Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides are a rapidly expanding class of natural products. They are typically biosynthesized by modification of a C-terminal segment of the precursor peptide (the core peptide). The precursor peptide also contains an N-terminal leader peptide that is required to guide the biosynthetic enzymes. For bioengineering purposes, the leader peptide is beneficial because it allows promiscuous activity of the biosynthetic enzymes with respect to modification of the core peptide sequence. However, the leader peptide also presents drawbacks as it needs to be present on the core peptide and then removed in a later step. We show that fusing the leader peptide for the lantibiotic lacticin 481 to its biosynthetic enzyme LctM allows the protein to act on core peptides without a leader peptide. We illustrate the use of this methodology for preparation of improved lacticin 481 analogues containing non-proteinogenic amino acids.
Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides are a rapidly expanding class of natural products. They are typically biosynthesized by modification of a C-terminal segment of the precursor peptide (the core peptide). The precursor peptide also contains an N-terminal leader peptide that is required to guide the biosynthetic enzymes. For bioengineering purposes, the leader peptide is beneficial because it allows promiscuous activity of the biosynthetic enzymes with respect to modification of the core peptide sequence. However, the leader peptide also presents drawbacks as it needs to be present on the core peptide and then removed in a later step. We show that fusing the leader peptide for the lantibiotic lacticin 481 to its biosynthetic enzyme LctM allows the protein to act on core peptides without a leader peptide. We illustrate the use of this methodology for preparation of improved lacticin 481 analogues containing non-proteinogenic amino acids.
Cyclic peptides are attracting
increased attention for their potential pharmaceutical applications.
They are metabolically more stable than linear peptides and are promising
candidates for disruption of protein–protein interactions.
Natural product cyclic peptides are generated by both non-ribosomal[1,2] and ribosomal pathways.[3] The molecules
produced by the latter route have rapidly expanded in both number
and structural diversity in recent years as a consequence of the explosion
in genomic sequence information.[4,5] These pathways, in which
a linear precursor peptide is generated ribosomally and subsequently
post-translationally modified, provide many attractive opportunities
for bioengineering. First, the amino acid sequence is genetically
encoded, allowing site-directed mutagenesis approaches to access analogues.
Second, the pathways toward these compounds usually involve a relatively
small number of biosynthetic enzymes, which often act iteratively.
In turn, such short pathways are more amenable to bioengineering approaches.
Third, the biosynthetic enzymes are often highly promiscuous, achieved
in part by a biosynthetic strategy in which the enzymes recognize
an N-terminal leader peptide that activates them toward catalyzing
post-translational modifications of the C-terminal core peptide that
will become the natural product (e.g., Figure 1).[6]
Figure 1
Biosynthesis of lacticin 481. The leader
is proteolytically removed
from the modified core peptide by a bifunctional protease/transporter
enzyme (LctT). Although the process is drawn as complete dehydration
by the bifunctional synthetase LctM before the commencement of cyclization,
recent studies suggest the dehydration and cyclization events may
be alternating.[13,14]
Biosynthesis of lacticin 481. The leader
is proteolytically removed
from the modified core peptide by a bifunctional protease/transporter
enzyme (LctT). Although the process is drawn as complete dehydration
by the bifunctional synthetase LctM before the commencement of cyclization,
recent studies suggest the dehydration and cyclization events may
be alternating.[13,14]Because the biosynthetic enzymes for these ribosomally
synthesized
cyclic peptides typically recognize the leader peptide, the sequence
of the core peptide is often hypervariable.[7−10] The post-translational modifications
release these natural products from the structural and functional
constraints imposed on natural ribosomal peptides, while at the same
time restricting conformational flexibility to allow better target
recognition and increased metabolic and chemical stability. An example
of such a system is shown in Figure 1 for lacticin
481, a member of the lantibiotic group of polycylic peptides. A single,
multifunctional enzyme LctM repeatedly dehydrates Ser and Thr residues
in the core peptide to generate the dehydroamino acids dehydroalanine
(Dha) and dehydrobutyrine (Dhb), respectively.[11] The enzyme subsequently catalyzes conjugate additions of
Cys residues to the α,β-unsaturated structures.[12]The attractive attributes of ribosomally
synthesized cyclic peptides
have not gone unnoticed, and a large number of studies have focused
on using site-directed mutagenesis to improve their properties.[15−20] Recently, these studies were extended to substitutions with non-proteinogenic
amino acids in Escherichia coli.[21−23] In addition,
an increasing number of these biosynthetic pathways has been reconstituted in vitro,[8,12,24−30] which has enabled the combination of promiscuous biosynthetic enzymes
with the power of peptide synthesis to generate molecular diversity.[31] A major current limitation of the latter approach
is that the leader peptide needs to be attached to synthetic core
peptides, which has been achieved by various orthogonal ligation strategies.[31−33] After post-translational modification, the leader needs to be removed,
typically with a commercial protease[8,12,29,34,35] or using photochemically labile linkers.[36] The overall process is inefficient and does not render this strategy
readily amenable for use with combinatorial peptide libraries.In an attempt to overcome the disadvantages of leader peptide attachment
and subsequent removal, we explored whether addition of the leader
and core peptides in trans would result in efficient
catalysis. In previous work, this approach was only partially successful
for lacticin 481, resulting in incompletely processed core peptides
when the leader and core peptides were present in low concentrations.[37] In this investigation, we increased the concentrations
of synthetic leader peptide, which resulted in products that were
three- or four-fold dehydrated as determined by matrix-assisted laser
desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) (Figure 2). All core peptides in this study contained an
Asn15Arg mutation previously identified as being beneficial for solubility
without compromising antimicrobial activity.[38] The four-fold dehydrated core peptide was purified by HPLC (Figures S1, S2) and did not react with 1-cyano-4-dimethylamino
pyridinium tetrafluoroborate (CDAP), a thiol-selective electrophile,
indicating that the three Cys residues underwent the desired Michael
additions. When the product was used for antimicrobial assays against Lactococcus lactis HP, its activity and that of an authentic
sample purified from the producer strain (L. lactis CNRZ 481, see Supporting Information)
were very similar. Thus, LctM can convert the core peptide of LctA
into lacticin 481 when the leader peptide is provided in trans.
Figure 2
Effect of leader peptide concentration on the in trans processing of the LctA core peptide by LctM. Shown are MALDI-TOF
mass spectra of the LctA core peptide after a 3 h incubation. The
final concentrations of the core peptide and enzyme were 20 μM
and 2 μM, respectively. Numbers above the peaks indicate the
number of dehydrations; an asterisk indicates a phosphorylated substrate;
SM indicates starting material.
Effect of leader peptide concentration on the in trans processing of the LctA core peptide by LctM. Shown are MALDI-TOF
mass spectra of the LctA core peptide after a 3 h incubation. The
final concentrations of the core peptide and enzyme were 20 μM
and 2 μM, respectively. Numbers above the peaks indicate the
number of dehydrations; an asterisk indicates a phosphorylated substrate;
SM indicates starting material.The successful production of lacticin 481 from
a leaderless core
peptide was encouraging, as it would no longer require ligation of
the leader peptide to synthetic core peptides. However, the overall
process is inefficient with regard to atom economy as it requires
relatively large concentrations of the synthetic leader peptide. We
envisioned that this disadvantage could potentially be overcome by
attaching the leader sequence of the LctA substrate to the LctM biosynthetic
enzyme by fusing their gene sequences. Activation of LctM by leader
peptide binding is believed to shift the equilibrium of active and
inactive conformations from predominantly inactive in the absence
of the leader peptide, to predominantly active in its presence (Figure 3A).[39] This model suggested
that attachment of the leader peptide to LctM (Figure 3B) would result in a high effective molarity and more efficient
catalysis than providing core and leader peptides in trans, thus yielding a constitutively active fusion (ConFusion) enzyme.
In addition, the leader peptide would not need to be synthesized independently
as it would be obtained during enzyme expression in E. coli. A related approach fused the NS3 protease/helicase involved in processing
the hepatitis C virus polyprotein to a portion of its activator protein,
resulting in a constitutively active protease.[40]
Figure 3
(A) The leader peptide is believed to trap an active conformation
of the enzyme that is present as a minor fraction in the absence of
the leader peptide. (B) Proposed model of a constitutively active
lacticin 481 synthetase. The LctA leader peptide (red) is covalently
fused to the synthetase via a flexible proteinogenic linker (purple).
As with the model in panel A, it was envisioned that the leader peptide
would shift the equilibrium population toward the active enzyme species,
thereby enabling the modification of LctA core peptide (green).
(A) The leader peptide is believed to trap an active conformation
of the enzyme that is present as a minor fraction in the absence of
the leader peptide. (B) Proposed model of a constitutively active
lacticin 481 synthetase. The LctA leader peptide (red) is covalently
fused to the synthetase via a flexible proteinogenic linker (purple).
As with the model in panel A, it was envisioned that the leader peptide
would shift the equilibrium population toward the active enzyme species,
thereby enabling the modification of LctA core peptide (green).To test the hypothesis, several heterologous expression
constructs
were generated that encoded a hexa-His-tagged LctA leader peptide
fused to the N-terminus of the LctM synthetase via a (GlySer) linker sequence (n = 1,
5, 10, and 15; Figure S3; longer linkers
decreased protein expression yields) to generate the LctM ConFusion
enzyme (LctCE-GS). The hybrid genes were
subcloned into a pET28b vector and overexpressed in E. coli, and the resulting fusion proteins were purified by immobilized
metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). Incubation of the core peptide
of LctA, obtained by solid-phase peptide synthesis, with LctCE-GSG,
ATP, and Mg2+ resulted in dehydration activity as demonstrated
by MALDI-MS. The desired four-fold dehydrated core peptide was observed
as a minor product along with intermediates that underwent one, two,
and three dehydrations (Figure 4). Reactions
utilizing LctCE-GS5, LctCE-GS10, or LctCE-GS15 resulted in progressively more efficient dehydration such
that with LctCE-GS15, the four-fold dehydrated core peptide
was the major product (Figure 4). After 1 h,
significant amounts of an intermediate with three dehydrations and
one phosphorylation were still present, but this intermediate is mostly
converted to four-fold dehydrated product by 180 min (Figure S4). Furthermore, HPLC analysis, CDAP assays, and bioactivity
assays (vide infra) demonstrated that the three thioether
rings were formed in the four-fold dehydrated product, demonstrating
LctCE-GS15 to be constitutively active. The protein was
obtained in 10 mg/L of E. coli cell culture without
any optimization of culturing and expression conditions.
Figure 4
Effect of linker
length on the processing of the core peptide by
a series of lacticin 481 ConFusion enzymes. Shown are MALDI-TOF mass
spectra of the LctA core peptide after 1 h of incubation. Indicated
to the right of the spectra is the enzyme utilized for the reaction.
The final concentrations of substrate and enzyme were 20 μM
and 2 μM, respectively. Numbers above the peaks indicate the
number of dehydrations. Asterisk indicates phosphorylated substrate;
SM = starting material.
Effect of linker
length on the processing of the core peptide by
a series of lacticin 481 ConFusion enzymes. Shown are MALDI-TOF mass
spectra of the LctA core peptide after 1 h of incubation. Indicated
to the right of the spectra is the enzyme utilized for the reaction.
The final concentrations of substrate and enzyme were 20 μM
and 2 μM, respectively. Numbers above the peaks indicate the
number of dehydrations. Asterisk indicates phosphorylated substrate;
SM = starting material.To evaluate the efficiency of LctCE-GS15, the modification
process of the core peptide catalyzed by LctCE-GS15 and
by wild-type LctM with a synthetic leader peptide provided in trans were evaluated using a combination of HPLC and
MALDI-MS. The modification assays were carried out at a 10:1 substrate:enzyme
ratio (final concentrations 20 μM substrate and 2 μM enzyme).
In the assay with His6-LctM, the LctA leader peptide was
supplemented at the same concentration as the synthetase enzyme, thus
mimicking the ConFusion enzyme where the leader and synthetase enzyme
are present in stoichiometric equivalents. Under conditions in which
the leader peptide was provided in trans, the fully
modified lacticin 481 core peptide was a minor product in the LctM-catalyzed
reaction after 3 h. In contrast, with the ConFusion enzyme LctCE-GS15 the four-fold dehydrated peptide was the major product (Figure S5). Importantly, after purification of
this four-fold dehydrated peptide, the antimicrobial activity of the
product was comparable to lacticin 481 isolated from the producer
organism.The observation that the LctCE-GS15 enzyme
correctly
breaks eight chemical bonds and generates six new chemical bonds in
the core peptide without the need for a leader peptide on the substrate
demonstrates that a covalent bond between the leader and core peptides
is not required for ensuring the correct regiochemistry of cyclization.
These results also suggest that the enzyme must have binding affinity
for the core peptide. A similar conclusion was reached recently by
the observation that pull-down of the dehydratase NisB and cyclase
NisC involved in the biosynthesis of the lantibiotic nisin required
the full-length substrate peptide including the core peptide.[41] Our results also rule out any model in which
the leader peptide is used to pull the core peptide through the active
site of LctM for directional processing.This methodology overcomes
two key limitations of in vitro biosynthesis of lantibiotics:
the efforts required to attach the
leader peptide to analogues of core peptides that contain non-proteinogenic
amino acids, and the challenges associated with leader peptide removal
during the final steps of lantibiotic maturation. Most of the native
proteases that remove leader peptides from ribosomally synthesized
peptide natural products are either unknown or are membrane-bound
proteins. Therefore, leader peptide removal for in vitro bioengineering studies has been achieved predominantly by mutagenesis
of the precursor peptide to include commercial protease recognition
sites.[8,29,35] Unfortunately,
these mutations can have deleterious effects, including reduced heterologous
expression levels, diminished or even abolished precursor peptide
processing by the biosynthetic enzymes, and non-specific proteolytic
cleavage after modification of the core peptide.To test the
generality of the ConFusion enzyme technology, several
analogues of lacticin 481 were prepared. Wild-type lacticin 481 demonstrates
sub-micromolar inhibitory activity (IC50 = 750 nM) against L. lactis HP.[31] Previous studies
have suggested that substitution of Trp19 and/or Phe21 with non-proteinogenic
amino acids improves the antimicrobial activity of lacticin 481.[31] However, the proteolytic step necessary to remove
the leader peptide in these studies resulted in lacticin 481 analogues
missing the N-terminal lysine, which is important for activity.[31] Because a proteolytic step is not required to
produce lacticin 481 analogues using LctCE, the products would include
this important residue. Four mutants of the LctA core peptide were
prepared by Fmoc-based solid-phase peptide synthesis containing the
following mutations: N15R/F21H, N15R/F21Pal, N15R/W19Nal/F21H, and
N15R/W19Nal/F21Pal (Pal = 3-(4′-pyridyl)alanine, Nal = 3-(2-naphthyl)alanine; Figure S6). The four mutant core peptides were
treated with purified His6-LctCE-GS15 in the
presence of Mg2+ and ATP. Fully modified product was generated
in each reaction with the efficiency comparable to that observed with
the wild-type core peptide. Partially processed intermediates were
readily separated from the desired product via reversed-phase HPLC
(Figure S7), and the fully modified material
was analyzed for antimicrobial activity against L. lactis HP. The IC50 for authentic lacticin 481 was 785 ±
19 nM, agreeing well with a previously reported value (750 nM).[31] Interestingly, lacticin 481 N15R/F21Pal and
lacticin 481 N15R/F21H displayed greater inhibitory activity compared
to authentic lacticin 481 with IC50 values of 213 ±
9 and 428 ± 21 nM, respectively. The triply substituted analogues
were not as active as authentic lacticin 481 under the conditions
tested (IC50 values of 1370 ± 48 nM for N15R/F21H/W23Nal
and 2420 ± 60 nM for N15R/F21Pal/W23Nal). Thus, improved analogues
of lacticin 481 can be prepared using this strategy.The ConFusion
approach allows relatively rapid evaluation of synthetic
peptides. When hits with improved antimicrobial activity are identified,
follow-up studies can focus on generating these analogues in larger
amounts by heterologous expression in E. coli using
stop-codon suppression methodology[42] or
auxotrophic strains. The successful application of such methodology
was recently illustrated for the prochlorosins and lichenicidins,
class II lanthionine containing peptides,[21,23] and for the cyanobactins, another group of post-translationally
modified peptide natural products.[22] Furthermore,
in the past year, 11 different lantibiotics have been successfully
produced in E. coli in several laboratories,[21,23,43−45] illustrating
the generality of this approach. However, lacticin 481 has not yet
been produced in E. coli. We therefore constructed
a pDUET co-expression vector containing LctM and His6-LctA
to test production of lacticin 481 in E. coliBL21
(DE3). After induction of expression with IPTG, harvesting of the
cells, lysis, and IMAC purification, His6-LctA was obtained
that had been completely processed (four dehydrations and three cyclizations).
Removal of the leader peptide with LysC resulted in the desired compound
as shown by HPLC, MS, and bioactivity assays (Figure S8). LysC was used in this final step instead of the
transmembrane protein LctT that removes the leader peptide in the
producer strain. Although the activity of the protease domain of LctT
has been reconstituted in vitro,[46] it possesses very low efficiency.In summary, this
work illustrates a platform that can rapidly transform
synthetic peptides into polycylic products to be evaluated for biological
activity. Because of the modularity of peptide synthesis, this methodology
enables SAR studies that can cover a much larger chemical space than
conventional site-directed mutagenesis. Once hits are identified,
the tools are available to achieve and optimize larger-scale production
of the compounds in E. coli.
Authors: Amanda L McClerren; Lisa E Cooper; Chao Quan; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher; Wilfred A van der Donk Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-11-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mohamed S Donia; Brian J Hathaway; Sebastian Sudek; Margo G Haygood; M J Rosovitz; Jacques Ravel; Eric W Schmidt Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2006-11-05 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Bo Li; John Paul J Yu; Joseph S Brunzelle; Gert N Moll; Wilfred A van der Donk; Satish K Nair Journal: Science Date: 2006-03-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kyle L Dunbar; Jonathan I Tietz; Courtney L Cox; Brandon J Burkhart; Douglas A Mitchell Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Dee Dee Luu; Anna Joe; Yan Chen; Katarzyna Parys; Ofir Bahar; Rory Pruitt; Leanne Jade G Chan; Christopher J Petzold; Kelsey Long; Clifford Adamchak; Valley Stewart; Youssef Belkhadir; Pamela C Ronald Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nidhi Kakkar; Jessica G Perez; Wenshe R Liu; Michael C Jewett; Wilfred A van der Donk Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Imran R Rahman; Jeella Z Acedo; Xiaoran Roger Liu; Lingyang Zhu; Justine Arrington; Michael L Gross; Wilfred A van der Donk Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 5.100