Literature DB >> 22332070

Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.

Steve Si Jia Feng1, Ioannis Sechopoulos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To comprehensively characterize the dosimetric properties of a clinical digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) system for the acquisition of mammographic and tomosynthesis images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Compressible water-oil mixture phantoms were created and imaged by using the automatic exposure control (AEC) of the Selenia Dimensions system (Hologic, Bedford, Mass) in both DBT and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) mode. Empirical measurements of the x-ray tube output were performed with a dosimeter to measure the air kerma for the range of tube current-exposure time product settings and to develop models of the automatically selected x-ray spectra. A Monte Carlo simulation of the system was developed and used in conjunction with the AEC-chosen settings and spectra models to compute and compare the mean glandular dose (MGD) resulting from both imaging modalities for breasts of varying sizes and glandular compositions.
RESULTS: Acquisition of a single craniocaudal view resulted in an MGD ranging from 0.309 to 5.26 mGy in FFDM mode and from 0.657 to 3.52 mGy in DBT mode. For a breast with a compressed thickness of 5.0 cm and a 50% glandular fraction, a DBT acquisition resulted in an only 8% higher MGD than an FFDM acquisition (1.30 and 1.20 mGy, respectively). For a breast with a compressed thickness of 6.0 cm and a 14.3% glandular fraction, a DBT acquisition resulted in an 83% higher MGD than an FFDM acquisition (2.12 and 1.16 mGy, respectively).
CONCLUSION: For two-dimensional-three-dimensional fusion imaging with the Selenia Dimensions system, the MGD for a 5-cm-thick 50% glandular breast is 2.50 mGy, which is less than the Mammography Quality Standards Act limit for a two-view screening mammography study. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22332070      PMCID: PMC3309800          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  21 in total

1.  Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998.

Authors:  K C Young; A Burch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results.

Authors:  J M Boone; K K Lindfors; V N Cooper; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Fewell; R J Jennings
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.

Authors:  G R Hammerstein; D W Miller; D R White; M E Masterson; H Q Woodard; J S Laughlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.

Authors:  N Jamal; K-H Ng; D McLean
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Tor D Tosteson; Christine A Kogel; Helene M Nagy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  37 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  X-ray scatter correction method for dedicated breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Digital breast tomosynthesis within a symptomatic "one-stop breast clinic" for characterization of subtle findings.

Authors:  G J Bansal; P Young
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Monochromatic breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation: phase-contrast and phase-retrieved image comparison and full-volume reconstruction.

Authors:  Luca Brombal; Bruno Golosio; Fulvia Arfelli; Deborah Bonazza; Adriano Contillo; Pasquale Delogu; Sandro Donato; Giovanni Mettivier; Piernicola Oliva; Luigi Rigon; Angelo Taibi; Giuliana Tromba; Fabrizio Zanconati; Renata Longo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 6.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A digital x-ray tomosynthesis coupled near infrared spectral tomography system for dual-modality breast imaging.

Authors:  Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Kelly E Michaelsen; Brian W Pogue; Steven P Poplack; Ian Shaw; Ken Defrietas; Ken Brooks; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Objective models of compressed breast shapes undergoing mammography.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Bhavika Patel; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Joy Melnikow; Joshua J Fenton; Evelyn P Whitlock; Diana L Miglioretti; Meghan S Weyrich; Jamie H Thompson; Kunal Shah
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.