Literature DB >> 10817044

Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998.

K C Young1, A Burch.   

Abstract

The mean glandular doses (MGDs) to samples of women attending for mammographic screening are measured routinely at screening centres in the UK Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP). This paper reviews the data collected during screening in the NHSBSP in 1997 and 1998 for 23,752 films, using 171 X-ray sets, for 8745 women. Average MGD was 2.03 mGy per oblique film and 1.65 mGy per craniocaudal film, similar to the MGDs found previously in the NHSBSP for the years 1994 and 1995. MGD was found to increase with compressed breast thickness where the tube potential was selected manually, so that the average dose for 10 cm thick breasts was 2.7 times the average for all breasts. For large breasts (> 70 mm) the use of X-ray sets such as the IGE DMR, which automatically select the beam quality for each breast, resulted in lower doses compared with sets using manual tube potential selection. MGD to the standard breast was found to vary from 0.7 to 2.2 mGy and to be correlated with the average MGD per mediolateral oblique film for the women screened on that system (R = 0.79). No correlation between age and MGD was found within the invited age range of 50-64 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10817044     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.867.10817044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

1.  Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012.

Authors:  Kenneth C Young; Jennifer M Oduko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Thyroid Radiation Dose to Patients from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures over Eight Decades: 1930-2010.

Authors:  Lienard A Chang; Donald L Miller; Choonsik Lee; Dunstana R Melo; Daphnée Villoing; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Sarah J Winters; Michael Labrake; Charles F Myers; Hyeyeun Lim; Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 6.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK).

Authors:  Anouk Pijpe; Nadine Andrieu; Douglas F Easton; Ausrele Kesminiene; Elisabeth Cardis; Catherine Noguès; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Christine Lasset; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind A Eeles; Joan Paterson; Peggy Manders; Christi J van Asperen; Margreet G E M Ausems; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Michael Hauptmann; David Goldgar; Matti A Rookus; Flora E van Leeuwen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-09-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.