Literature DB >> 12711643

A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.

N Jamal1, K-H Ng, D McLean.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to determine the mean glandular dose (MGD) during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia. The secondary objective was to evaluate some of the factors affecting MGD. A survey of standard MGD was performed, based upon quality control records for the period October 1999 to August 2001. This covered 30 mammography units from 9 manufacturers. MGD was also measured for a series of patients attending mammography examinations at three other mammography units. MGD per film was estimated from recorded radiographic factors, the compressed breast thickness (CBT) and X-ray unit calibration data. MGD per woman was calculated by summing the MGDs for all films, and averaging it over both breasts. 300 women drawn equally from three major ethnic groups, namely Malay, Chinese and Indian, took part in the study. The difference of MGD per woman between ethnic groups was tested for significance using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and median tests. The factors affecting MGD per woman were tested for significance using a multivariate analysis of variance. The MGD for the phantom was 1.23 mGy (range 0.22-2.39 mGy) while the mean patient based MGD per film was 1.54 mGy and 1.82 mGy for the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views, respectively. The mean MGD per woman was 3.37 mGy. It was also found that there is no significant difference in MGD per woman among the ethnic groups (p>0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). However, on the multivariate test two factors, namely half value layer of the X-ray beam and (CBT), had a significant effect on MGD per woman (p<0.05). No significant relationships were seen between MGD per woman with respect to ethnicity, body mass index or age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711643     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/66428508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Robert S Saunders
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities.

Authors:  Dc Spelic; Rv Kaczmarek; M Hilohi; S Belella
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01

6.  Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography.

Authors:  Ai Kawaguchi; Yuta Matsunaga; Tomoko Otsuka; Shoichi Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-01

Review 7.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  Methods Used in Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammograms: A Review.

Authors:  Saleem Z Ramadan
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide.

Authors:  Cláudia Reis; Ana Pascoal; Taxiarchis Sakellaris; Manthos Koutalonis
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-08-04

10.  Comparison of Mean Glandular Dose between Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Kar Choon Teoh; Hanani Abdul Manan; Norhashimah Mohd Norsuddin; Iqbal Hussain Rizuana
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.