Literature DB >> 23298127

A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Ioannis Sechopoulos1.   

Abstract

Many important post-acquisition aspects of breast tomosynthesis imaging can impact its clinical performance. Chief among them is the reconstruction algorithm that generates the representation of the three-dimensional breast volume from the acquired projections. But even after reconstruction, additional processes, such as artifact reduction algorithms, computer aided detection and diagnosis, among others, can also impact the performance of breast tomosynthesis in the clinical realm. In this two part paper, a review of breast tomosynthesis research is performed, with an emphasis on its medical physics aspects. In the companion paper, the first part of this review, the research performed relevant to the image acquisition process is examined. This second part will review the research on the post-acquisition aspects, including reconstruction, image processing, and analysis, as well as the advanced applications being investigated for breast tomosynthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298127      PMCID: PMC3548896          DOI: 10.1118/1.4770281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  104 in total

1.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography.

Authors:  S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; S Vedantham; S J Glick; C J D'Orsi; S P Baker; R L Webber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.

Authors:  Matthew G Wallis; Elin Moa; Federica Zanca; Karin Leifland; Mats Danielsson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Classification of clusters of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Candy P S Ho; Christopher Tromans; Julia A Schnabel; Michael Brady
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

4.  Correlating locations in ipsilateral breast tomosynthesis views using an analytical hemispherical compression model.

Authors:  Guido van Schie; Christine Tanner; Peter Snoeren; Maurice Samulski; Karin Leifland; Matthew G Wallis; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Dependence of image quality on geometric factors in breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Aili Bloomquist; Xinying Wang; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography.

Authors:  R Gordon; R Bender; G T Herman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging.

Authors:  Florian F Schmitzberger; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Rüdiger Lawaczeck; Magnus Hemmendorff; Elin Moa; Mats Danielsson; Ulrich Bick; Susanne Diekmann; Alexander Pöllinger; Florian J Engelken; Felix Diekmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Joseph Y Lo; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Compositional-prior-guided image reconstruction algorithm for multi-modality imaging.

Authors:  Qianqian Fang; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; David A Boas
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  42 in total

1.  Use of the Hotelling observer to optimize image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Adrian A Sánchez; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Impact of lesion segmentation metrics on computer-aided diagnosis/detection in breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Hsien-Chi Kuo; Maryellen L Giger; Ingrid Reiser; Karen Drukker; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors; Kai Yang; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-24

4.  Grating-based phase contrast tomosynthesis imaging: proof-of-concept experimental studies.

Authors:  Ke Li; Yongshuai Ge; John Garrett; Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Travis Johnson; Muqing Lin; Huy Q Le; Justin L Ducote; Min-Ying Su; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Synthesizing mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Colleen H Neal; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Rongping Zeng; Aldo Badano; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.

Authors:  Ye-seul Kim; Hye-suk Park; Haeng-Hwa Lee; Young-Wook Choi; Jae-Gu Choi; Hak Hee Kim; Hee-Joung Kim
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sean D Rose; Adrian A Sanchez; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.