Literature DB >> 760167

Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.

G R Hammerstein, D W Miller, D R White, M E Masterson, H Q Woodard, J S Laughlin.   

Abstract

Radiation dose from mammographic techniques was determined as a function of surface exposure, beam quality, and depth. Relative exposure vs. depth was measured in tissue-substitute materials by thermoluminescent dosimetry. The f-factors were calculated from elemental compositions of mastectomy specimens. Dose at depth depends on beam quality as well as exposure and tissue composition. Analysis of data from the ACS/NCI Screening Centers shows current average midbreast doses to be 25 times lower (film/screen) and 3 times lower (Xerox) than the 2 rads previously estimated. Quantitative risk indicators other than midbreast dose are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 760167     DOI: 10.1148/130.2.485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  82 in total

1.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose for circle-plus-line trajectory.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Frederic Noo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom.

Authors:  Beverly A Lau; Ingrid Reiser; Robert M Nishikawa; Predrag R Bakic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Statistical analysis of mammographic breast composition measurements: towards a quantitative measure of relative breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Steve Si Jia Feng; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Three dimensional dose distribution comparison of simple and complex acquisition trajectories in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Production design and evaluation of a novel breast phantom with various breast glandular fractions.

Authors:  Tatsuya Fujisaki; Masaya Kimura; Hidetoshi Saitoh; Shinji Abe; Takeshi Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-12-25

Review 10.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.