Literature DB >> 18583372

Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.

M Loubele1, F Maes, R Jacobs, D van Steenberghe, S C White, P Suetens.   

Abstract

The image quality of four cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanners dedicated for dentomaxillofacial imaging and one multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) scanner was compared. For the MSCT scanner, a clinical and a low-dose protocol for oral indications were evaluated. The image quality was assessed by dedicated software that allows an automated analysis of accuracy measurements and evaluation of metal artefacts on two image quality phantoms. Bone was segmented with sub-millimetre accuracyin all scanners.

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18583372     DOI： 10.1093/rpd/ncn154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN： 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  22 in total

1.  The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT.

Authors:  B Vandenberghe; S Luchsinger; J Hostens; E Dhoore; R Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Development of a low-dose protocol for cone beam CT examinations of the anterior maxilla in children.

Authors:  Jose A Hidalgo Rivas; Keith Horner; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jonathan Davies; Chrysoula Theodorakou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.

Authors:  R A Katkar; C Kummet; D Dawson; L Moreno Uribe; V Allareddy; M Finkelstein; A Ruprecht
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging.

Authors:  Jens De Cock; Federica Zanca; John Canning; Ruben Pauwels; Robert Hermans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Spatial and contrast resolution of ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging using iterative reconstruction technology.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Alexander Bischel; Andreas Stratis; Hilde Bosmans; Reinhilde Jacobs; Eva-Maria Gassner; Wolfgang Puelacher; Ruben Pauwels
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 7.  Quality assurance phantoms for cone beam computed tomography: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marcus V L de Oliveira; Ann Wenzel; Paulo S F Campos; Rubens Spin-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Influence of scan setting selections on root canal visibility with cone beam CT.

Authors:  B A Hassan; J Payam; B Juyanda; P van der Stelt; P R Wesselink
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography--an in-vitro investigation.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hofmann; Matthias Schmid; Martin Sedlmair; Rosemarie Banckwitz; Ursula Hirschfelder; Michael Lell
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Bassam Hassan; Paulo Couto Souza; Reinhilde Jacobs; Soraya de Azambuja Berti; Paul van der Stelt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.