Literature DB >> 20074247

Tolerance within a surgical guide.

N Van Assche1, M Quirynen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, guided surgery has been introduced and several papers verified its accuracy. AIM: While those studies reported on the accuracy of the entire procedure, this experiment wanted to make clinicians aware of the amount of the deviation that can already occur during the drilling procedure alone, due to the tolerance of the drill in the drill key.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Drilling was executed in plexi-glass with a maximal inclination of the drills within the drill keys.
RESULTS: A mean deviation in angulation of 4.7 degrees occurred with a mean horizontal deviation at the implant shoulder of 0.8 mm and 1.8 mm at the apex of 13 mm implant. The deviation was further dependent of the implant length, the distance of the sleeve above the bone and the respective guiding system. DISCUSSION: Increasing the height of the drill key will minimize the inaccuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from this experiment showed the importance of keeping the drill parallel to the guide in a centric position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20074247     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01836.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

1.  The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT.

Authors:  B Vandenberghe; S Luchsinger; J Hostens; E Dhoore; R Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  3D imaging, 3D printing and 3D virtual planning in endodontics.

Authors:  Pratik Shah; B S Chong
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Transcrestal guided sinus lift without grafting materials: a 36 months clinical prospective study.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G DE Vico; R Condò; L Ottria; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-25

4.  Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: A comparison of operator experience.

Authors:  Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Joseph M Caruso; Joseph Y K Kan; Filip Schutyser; Tiny Boumans
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of novel digital workflow and dynamic navigation for single-implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone: 1-year prospective case series.

Authors:  Alessandro Pozzi; Lorenzo Arcuri; Paolo Carosi; Alessandra Nardi; Joseph Kan
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.021

6.  Accuracy of a direct drill-guiding system with minimal tolerance of surgical instruments used for implant surgery: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Du-Hyeong Lee; Seo-Young An; Min-Ho Hong; Kyoung-Bae Jeon; Kyu-Bok Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Pre-surgical Provisional Prosthesis for Immediate Non-occlusal-loaded Flapless Implant.

Authors:  Athiban Inbarajan; Fathima Banu; Padmanabhan Tv; Anand Kumar; Madhan Seenivasan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-06-13

8.  CAD/CAM implant surgical guides: maximum errors in implant positioning attributable to the properties of the metal sleeve/osteotomy drill combination.

Authors:  Dimitrios Apostolakis; Georgios Kourakis
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-11-09

9.  Computer-assisted, template-guided immediate implant placement and loading in the mandible: a case report.

Authors:  Thomas Spielau; Uli Hauschild; Joannis Katsoulis
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Accuracy of mucosa supported guided dental implant surgery.

Authors:  Andoni Jones
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2018-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.