Literature DB >> 26732433

Dose optimization by altering the operating potential and tube current exposure time product in dental cone beam CT: a systematic review.

Rebekah Goulston1, Jonathan Davies2, Keith Horner2, Frederick Murphy3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines highlight the need to optimize exposure parameters on CBCT equipment to levels that are as low as diagnostically acceptable. This systematic review aimed to answer the question "Can altering operating potential (kV) and tube current exposure time product (mAs) on CBCT machines reduce radiation dose to patients undergoing dental and/or maxillofacial scans without a detrimental impact on image quality/diagnostic accuracy?"
METHODS: Studies were selected and results reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. For each individual study, two authors (RG and JD or KH) independently extracted data using a specifically designed collection form, and an overall quality value was assigned using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Any disagreements in the overall quality value of a study were resolved by discussion between the current authors.
RESULTS: Nearly 75% of studies were considered to be of low or very low methodological quality using the GRADE system, and more studies stated that their results applied only in the specific situations they had investigated. However, most studies demonstrated that patient dose reduction is possible without a clinically relevant reduction in image quality.
CONCLUSIONS: For many CBCT machines, it should be possible to optimize one, or more, of the investigated exposure parameters and therefore reduce patient radiation dose, while maintaining diagnostic image quality for some diagnostic tasks. However, more rigorous research is still required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cone-beam computed tomography; exposure parameters; image quality; radiation protection; review, systematic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26732433      PMCID: PMC4846147          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  39 in total

1.  Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Karen Borges Waltrick; Murillo José Nunes de Abreu Junior; Márcio Corrêa; Michella Dinah Zastrow; Vinícius D'Avila Dutra
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Tilting the jaw to improve the image quality or to reduce the dose in cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Marlen Luckow; Hans Deyhle; Felix Beckmann; Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt; Bert Müller
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro.

Authors:  Jaideep Sur; Kenji Seki; Hiroshi Koizumi; Koh Nakajima; Tomohiro Okano
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-07-02

4.  Effect of exposure time on the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions in dry skulls.

Authors:  Asmáa A Al-Ekrish
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2012-06-01

Review 5.  Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review.

Authors:  A M Shelley; A-M Glenny; M Goodwin; P Brunton; K Horner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

7.  Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  A Suomalainen; T Kiljunen; Y Käser; J Peltola; M Kortesniemi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results.

Authors:  P Mozzo; C Procacci; A Tacconi; P T Martini; I A Andreis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.

Authors:  A Parsa; N Ibrahim; B Hassan; A Motroni; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Number of basis images effect on detection of root fractures in endodontically treated teeth using a cone beam computed tomography machine: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Boulos Bechara; C Alex McMahan; Ibrahim Nasseh; Hassem Geha; Elie Hayek; Georges Khawam; Michel Raad; Marcel Noujeim
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2013-05
View more
  12 in total

1.  Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations.

Authors:  Ayman Al-Okshi; Chrysoula Theodorakou; Christina Lindh
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers.

Authors:  Yohei Takeshita; Mayumi Shimizu; Kazutoshi Okamura; Shoko Yoshida; Warangkana Weerawanich; Kenji Tokumori; Gainer R Jasa; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of the accuracy of full head cone beam CT images obtained using a large field of view and stitched images.

Authors:  Mehmet Ozgur Ozemre; Ayse Gulsahi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Analysis of the priority of anatomic structures according to the diagnostic task in cone-beam computed tomographic images.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-12-20

5.  Relationship between CNR and visibility of anatomical structures of cone-beam computed tomography images under different exposure parameters.

Authors:  Miss Fei Wang; Xiaoyan Xie; Gang Li; Zuyan Zhang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Effect of Milliamperage Reduction on Pre-surgical Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography by Surgeons of Varying Experience.

Authors:  N El Sahili; S David-Tchouda; S Thoret; I Nasseh; A Berberi; T Fortin
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-12-20

7.  Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.

Authors:  Ruben Pauwels; Pisha Pittayapat; Phonkit Sinpitaksakul; Soontra Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 8.  Two decades of research on CBCT imaging in DMFR - an appraisal of scientific evidence.

Authors:  Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; André Ferreira Leite; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Cone beam computed tomography in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a two-decade overview.

Authors:  Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Tamara Alzoubi; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Kaan Orhan; Ruben Pauwels; Jan W Casselman; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  A meta-review of effective doses in dental and maxillofacial cone beam CT using the ROBIS tool.

Authors:  Ayman Al-Okshi; Keith Horner; Madeleine Rohlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.