Literature DB >> 18672982

Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.

Ahmet Ersan Ersoy1, Ilser Turkyilmaz, Oguz Ozan, Edwin A McGlumphy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dental implant placement requires precise planning with regard to anatomic limitations and restorative goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the match between the positions and axes of the planned and placed implants using stereolithographic (SLA) surgical guides.
METHODS: Ninety-four implants were placed using SLA surgical guides generated from computed tomography (CT) between 2005 and 2006. Radiographic templates were used for all subjects during CT imaging. After obtaining three-dimensional CT images, each implant was virtually placed on the CT images. SLA surgical guides, fabricated using an SLA machine with a laser beam to polymerize the liquid photo-polymerized resin, were used during implant placement. A new CT scan was taken for each subject following implant placement. Special software was used to fuse the images of the planned and placed implants, and the locations and axes were compared.
RESULTS: Compared to the planned implants, the placed implants showed angular deviation of 4.9 degrees+/-2.36 degrees, whereas the mean linear deviation was 1.22+/-0.85 mm at the implant neck and 1.51+/-1 mm at the implant apex. Compared to the implant planning, the angular deviation and linear deviation at the neck and apex of the placed maxillary implants were 5.31 degrees+/-0.36 degrees, 1.04+/-0.56 mm, and 1.57+/-0.97 mm, respectively, whereas corresponding figures for placed mandibular implants were 4.44 degrees+/-0.31 degrees, 1.42+/-1.05 mm, and 1.44+/-1.03 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: SLA surgical guides using CT data may be reliable in implant placement and make flapless implant placement possible.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18672982     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.080059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  27 in total

1.  The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT.

Authors:  B Vandenberghe; S Luchsinger; J Hostens; E Dhoore; R Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement.

Authors:  Wei Geng; Changying Liu; Yucheng Su; Jun Li; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

4.  Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability.

Authors:  O Schubert; J Schweiger; M Stimmelmayr; E Nold; J-F Güth
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 5.  3D printing in dentistry.

Authors:  A Dawood; B Marti Marti; V Sauret-Jackson; A Darwood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  3D accuracy of implant positions in template-guided implant placement as a function of the remaining teeth and the surgical procedure: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Cornelia Edelmann; Heike Rudolph; Jens Dreyhaupt; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Transcrestal guided sinus lift without grafting materials: a 36 months clinical prospective study.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G DE Vico; R Condò; L Ottria; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-25

8.  Determination of the dynamics of healing at the tissue-implant interface by means of microcomputed tomography and functional apparent moduli.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Yang-Jo Seol; Steven A Goldstein; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: A literature review.

Authors:  Gokce-Soganci Unsal; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Samantha Lakhia
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

10.  Effects of Implant-Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Takashi Matsuoka; Tamaki Nakano; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Shinji Ono; Shota Watanabe; Takumi Sato; Hirofumi Yatani
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.