Literature DB >> 25234912

Loudness summation using focused and unfocused electrical stimulation.

Monica Padilla1, David M Landsberger1.   

Abstract

With a cochlear implant, when stimulation from multiple channels is interleaved, the perceived loudness is greater than the loudness associated with any of the individual channels presented in isolation. This phenomenon is known as loudness summation. This study examined if loudness summation with monopolar and tripolar stimulation were equivalent at two loudnesses and two spacing configurations. Results suggest that loudness summation is similar for monopolar and tripolar modes. However, larger summation differences were observed for softer sounds and louder sounds with a larger spatial separation. The results are consistent with the idea that loudness summation is dependent on channel interaction and have implications for implementing current-focused processing strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234912      PMCID: PMC4042455          DOI: 10.1121/1.4862877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Matthew C Schoenecker; Ben H Bonham; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22

2.  Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Carlo K Berenstein; Filiep J Vanpoucke; Jef J S Mulder; Lucas H M Mens
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants.

Authors:  M Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing.

Authors:  David Landsberger; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Neural excitation patterns induced by phased-array stimulation in the implanted human cochlea.

Authors:  Johan H M Frijns; David M T Dekker; Jeroen J Briaire
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; David M Landsberger; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  3 in total

1.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A Dynamically Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategy Can Improve Vowel Identification in Noise.

Authors:  Julie G Arenberg; Wendy S Parkinson; Leonid Litvak; Chen Chen; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.