Literature DB >> 22197852

Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children.

Jane Hornickel1, Erica Knowles, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

The click-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) is widely used in clinical settings, partly due to its predictability and high test-retest consistency. More recently, the speech-evoked ABR has been used to evaluate subcortical processing of complex signals, allowing for the objective assessment of biological processes underlying auditory function and auditory processing deficits not revealed by responses to clicks. Test-retest reliability of some components of speech-evoked ABRs has been shown for adults and children over the course of months. However, a systematic study of the consistency of the speech-evoked brainstem response in school-age children has not been conducted. In the present study, speech-evoked ABRs were collected from 26 typically-developing children (ages 8-13) at two time points separated by one year. ABRs were collected for /da/ presented in quiet and in a 6-talker babble background noise. Test-retest consistency of response timing, spectral encoding, and signal-to-noise ratio was assessed. Response timing and spectral encoding were highly replicable over the course of one year. The consistency of response timing and spectral encoding found for the speech-evoked ABRs of typically-developing children suggests that the speech-evoked ABR may be a unique tool for research and clinical assessment of auditory function, particularly with respect to auditory-based communication skills.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197852      PMCID: PMC3289746          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  28 in total

1.  Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials.

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; B Kwong; M Don
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Latency stability of auditory brainstem responses in children aged 10-12 years compared with younger children and adults.

Authors:  J L Lauter; R F Oyler
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1992-08

3.  Brainstem responses to speech syllables.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Trent Nicol; Gabriella Musacchia; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Methods to eliminate stimulus transduction artifact from insert earphones during electroencephalography.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; Jess R Kerlin; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  An improved procedure for assessing ABR latency in young subjects based on a new normative data set.

Authors:  A Issa; H F Ross
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Longitudinal study of brainstem auditory evoked responses in 87 normal human subjects.

Authors:  R J Tusa; W F Stewart; A L Shechter; D Simon; J N Liberman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Sources of variability in auditory brain stem evoked potential measures over time.

Authors:  R M Edwards; J S Buchwald; P E Tanguay; J A Schwafel
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-02

Review 8.  Maturation of the auditory brainstem response from birth through early childhood.

Authors:  A Salamy
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems.

Authors:  Brad Wible; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Nicole M Russo; Trent G Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Erin A Hayes; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  24 in total

1.  Speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses reflect familial and cognitive influences.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Deborah Lin; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-01

2.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

Review 3.  An Analysis of The Parameters Used In Speech ABR Assessment Protocols.

Authors:  Milaine D Sanfins; Stavros Hatzopoulos; Caroline Donadon; Thais A Diniz; Leticia R Borges; Piotr H Skarzynski; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

4.  Stability and plasticity in neural encoding of linguistically relevant pitch patterns.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.

Authors:  Travis White-Schwoch; Evan C Davies; Elaine C Thompson; Kali Woodruff Carr; Trent Nicol; Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Biological impact of preschool music classes on processing speech in noise.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Samantha O'Connell; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Steven G Zecker; Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.