Literature DB >> 15474654

Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem.

Nicole M Russo1, Trent G Nicol, Steven G Zecker, Erin A Hayes, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

The auditory brainstem response reflects neural encoding of the acoustic characteristic of a speech syllable with remarkable precision. Some children with learning impairments demonstrate abnormalities in this preconscious measure of neural encoding especially in background noise. This study investigated whether auditory training targeted to remediate perceptually-based learning problems would alter the neural brainstem encoding of the acoustic sound structure of speech in such children. Nine subjects, clinically diagnosed with a language-based learning problem (e.g., dyslexia), worked with auditory perceptual training software. Prior to beginning and within three months after completing the training program, brainstem responses to the syllable /da/ were recorded in quiet and background noise. Subjects underwent additional auditory neurophysiological, perceptual, and cognitive testing. Ten control subjects, who did not participate in any remediation program, underwent the same battery of tests at time intervals equivalent to the trained subjects. Transient and sustained (frequency-following response) components of the brainstem response were evaluated. The primary pathway afferent volley -- neural events occurring earlier than 11 ms after stimulus onset -- did not demonstrate plasticity. However, quiet-to-noise inter-response correlations of the sustained response ( approximately 11-50 ms) increased significantly in the trained children, reflecting improved stimulus encoding precision, whereas control subjects did not exhibit this change. Thus, auditory training can alter the preconscious neural encoding of complex sounds by improving neural synchrony in the auditory brainstem. Additionally, several measures of brainstem response timing were related to changes in cortical physiology, as well as perceptual, academic, and cognitive measures from pre- to post-training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15474654     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  101 in total

1.  Speech evoked auditory brainstem responses: a new tool to study brainstem encoding of speech sounds.

Authors:  Sujeet Kumar Sinha; Vijayalakshmi Basavaraj
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-11

2.  Decoding temporal structure in music and speech relies on shared brain resources but elicits different fine-scale spatial patterns.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Anjali Bhatara; Srikanth Ryali; Evan Balaban; Daniel J Levitin; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

4.  Novelty detection in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Lavinia Slabu; Sabine Grimm; Carles Escera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Stable auditory processing underlies phonological awareness in typically developing preschoolers.

Authors:  Silvia Bonacina; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Jennifer Krizman; Travis White-Schwoch; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Emotion and the auditory brainstem response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Q Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 9.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Emotion modulates early auditory response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.