Literature DB >> 31505395

Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.

Jennifer Krizman1, Nina Kraus2.   

Abstract

The frequency-following response, or FFR, is a neurophysiological response to sound that precisely reflects the ongoing dynamics of sound. It can be used to study the integrity and malleability of neural encoding of sound across the lifespan. Sound processing in the brain can be impaired with pathology and enhanced through expertise. The FFR can index linguistic deprivation, autism, concussion, and reading impairment, and can reflect the impact of enrichment with short-term training, bilingualism, and musicianship. Because of this vast potential, interest in the FFR has grown considerably in the decade since our first tutorial. Despite its widespread adoption, there remains a gap in the current knowledge of its analytical potential. This tutorial aims to bridge this gap. Using recording methods we have employed for the last 20 + years, we have explored many analysis strategies. In this tutorial, we review what we have learned and what we think constitutes the most effective ways of capturing what the FFR can tell us. The tutorial covers FFR components (timing, fundamental frequency, harmonics) and factors that influence FFR (stimulus polarity, response averaging, and stimulus presentation/recording jitter). The spotlight is on FFR analyses, including ways to analyze FFR timing (peaks, autocorrelation, phase consistency, cross-phaseogram), magnitude (RMS, SNR, FFT), and fidelity (stimulus-response correlations, response-to-response correlations and response consistency). The wealth of information contained within an FFR recording brings us closer to understanding how the brain reconstructs our sonic world.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31505395      PMCID: PMC6778514          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  95 in total

1.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Speech-evoked brainstem frequency-following responses during verbal transformations due to word repetition.

Authors:  G C Galbraith; S P Jhaveri; J Kuo
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01

3.  Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.

Authors:  Parker Tichko; Erika Skoe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  An Analysis of The Parameters Used In Speech ABR Assessment Protocols.

Authors:  Milaine D Sanfins; Stavros Hatzopoulos; Caroline Donadon; Thais A Diniz; Leticia R Borges; Piotr H Skarzynski; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.

Authors:  Fuh-Cherng Jeng; Jiong Hu; Brenda Dickman; Karen Montgomery-Reagan; Meiling Tong; Guangqiang Wu; Chia-Der Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Brainstem encoding of voiced consonant--vowel stop syllables.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Ann R Bradlow; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  The temporal relationship between speech auditory brainstem responses and the acoustic pattern of the phoneme /ba/ in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  I Akhoun; S Gallégo; A Moulin; M Ménard; E Veuillet; C Berger-Vachon; L Collet; H Thai-Van
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Musical training enhances neural processing of binaural sounds.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Dana L Strait; Emily Hittner; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  26 in total

1.  Auditory Processing Differences in Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Maranda K Jones; Nina Kraus; Silvia Bonacina; Trent Nicol; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Megan Y Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Oscillatory Entrainment of the Frequency-following Response in Auditory Cortical and Subcortical Structures.

Authors:  Emily B J Coffey; Isabelle Arseneau-Bruneau; Xiaochen Zhang; Sylvain Baillet; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Memory Specific to Temporal Features of Sound Is Formed by Cue-Selective Enhancements in Temporal Coding Enabled by Inhibition of an Epigenetic Regulator.

Authors:  Elena K Rotondo; Kasia M Bieszczad
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Play Sports for a Quieter Brain: Evidence From Division I Collegiate Athletes.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Tory Lindley; Silvia Bonacina; Danielle Colegrove; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Auditory neurophysiology reveals central nervous system dysfunction in HIV-infected individuals.

Authors:  Travis White-Schwoch; Albert K Magohe; Abigail M Fellows; Catherine C Rieke; Brandon Vilarello; Trent Nicol; Enica R Massawe; Ndeserua Moshi; Nina Kraus; Jay C Buckey
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Causal Relationship between the Right Auditory Cortex and Speech-Evoked Envelope-Following Response: Evidence from Combined Transcranial Stimulation and Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Guangting Mai; Peter Howell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Auditory neurophysiological development in early childhood: A growth curve modeling approach.

Authors:  Elaine C Thompson; Ryne Estabrook; Jennifer Krizman; Spencer Smith; Stephanie Huang; Travis White-Schwoch; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 4.861

8.  Sex differences in subcortical auditory processing only partially explain higher prevalence of language disorders in males.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Silvia Bonacina; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Frequency Selectivity of Persistent Cortical Oscillatory Responses to Auditory Rhythmic Stimulation.

Authors:  Jacques Pesnot Lerousseau; Agnès Trébuchon; Benjamin Morillon; Daniele Schön
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Rhythm, reading, and sound processing in the brain in preschool children.

Authors:  Silvia Bonacina; Stephanie Huang; Travis White-Schwoch; Jennifer Krizman; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.