Literature DB >> 23872199

Biological impact of preschool music classes on processing speech in noise.

Dana L Strait1, Alexandra Parbery-Clark, Samantha O'Connell, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Musicians have increased resilience to the effects of noise on speech perception and its neural underpinnings. We do not know, however, how early in life these enhancements arise. We compared auditory brainstem responses to speech in noise in 32 preschool children, half of whom were engaged in music training. Thirteen children returned for testing one year later, permitting the first longitudinal assessment of subcortical auditory function with music training. Results indicate emerging neural enhancements in musically trained preschoolers for processing speech in noise. Longitudinal outcomes reveal that children enrolled in music classes experience further increased neural resilience to background noise following one year of continued training compared to nonmusician peers. Together, these data reveal enhanced development of neural mechanisms undergirding speech-in-noise perception in preschoolers undergoing music training and may indicate a biological impact of music training on auditory function during early childhood.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABR; Auditory; Brainstem; Development; Language; Music training; Musicians; Subcortical

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872199      PMCID: PMC3844086          DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1878-9293            Impact factor:   6.464


  78 in total

1.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Frequency resolution in children.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman; D Kistler; T Dolan
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-06

Review 5.  Neuronal migration disorders: from genetic diseases to developmental mechanisms.

Authors:  J G Gleeson; C A Walsh
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Time course of axonal myelination in the human brainstem auditory pathway.

Authors:  J K Moore; L M Perazzo; A Braun
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Courtney Stevens; Brittni Lauinger; Helen Neville
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-07

9.  Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Carrie Lam; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Musicians change their tune: how hearing loss alters the neural code.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  17 in total

1.  Music training alters the course of adolescent auditory development.

Authors:  Adam T Tierney; Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Environmental acoustic enrichment promotes recovery from developmentally degraded auditory cortical processing.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhu; Fang Wang; Huifang Hu; Xinde Sun; Michael P Kilgard; Michael M Merzenich; Xiaoming Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response; electrophysiological evidence of upper brainstem facilitative role on sound lateralization in noise.

Authors:  Abdollah Moossavi; Yones Lotfi; Mohanna Javanbakht; Soghrat Faghihzadeh
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Biological impact of auditory expertise across the life span: musicians as a model of auditory learning.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Auditory reserve and the legacy of auditory experience.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2014-11-14

6.  The medium helps the message: Early sensitivity to auditory fluency in children's endorsement of statements.

Authors:  Stéphane Bernard; Joëlle Proust; Fabrice Clément
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-04

7.  Auditory learning through active engagement with sound: biological impact of community music lessons in at-risk children.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Jessica Slater; Elaine C Thompson; Jane Hornickel; Dana L Strait; Trent Nicol; Travis White-Schwoch
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Art and science: how musical training shapes the brain.

Authors:  Karen Chan Barrett; Richard Ashley; Dana L Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16

9.  Musical training heightens auditory brainstem function during sensitive periods in development.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-19

10.  High school music classes enhance the neural processing of speech.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Kathleen Johnston; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.