Literature DB >> 7607819

An improved procedure for assessing ABR latency in young subjects based on a new normative data set.

A Issa1, H F Ross.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) latencies in normal young and very young subjects are longer than in mature subjects. Use of adult norms in the assessment of young subjects may therefore result in the erroneous reporting of abnormalities in subjects who are in no way impaired. In this study a new normative data set was established by measuring ABR absolute and interpeak latencies in 374 subjects in different age groups with normal ABR and no risk factor for hearing impairment or neurological abnormality. Double exponential functions were fitted to a number of latency measures derived from the data and from those functions a table of correction values was computed. The variability in the measurements of the children is greater than that of the adults. Procedures are proposed which enable the assessment of abnormality of ABR latencies to be made for all subjects regardless of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7607819     DOI: 10.1016/0165-5876(94)01110-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  8 in total

1.  Fitting model of ABR age dependency in a clinical population of normal hearing children.

Authors:  S Coenraad; T van Immerzeel; L J Hoeve; A Goedegebure
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The auditory brainstem response: latencies obtained in children while under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Linda W Norrix; Stacey Trepanier; Matthew Atlas; Darlyne Kim
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erica Knowles; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory phenotype of Niemann-Pick disease, type C1.

Authors:  Kelly A King; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Nicole Yanjanin; Christopher Zalewski; Ari Houser; Forbes D Porter; Carmen C Brewer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Incidence and clinical value of prolonged I-V interval in NICU infants after failing neonatal hearing screening.

Authors:  S Coenraad; L J Hoeve; A Goedegebure
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I: Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Karolina Kluk; Agnès Léger; Deborah A Hall; Michael G Heinz; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Wenhe Tu; Hannah Guest; Rebecca E Millman; Karolina Kluk; Samuel Couth; Kevin J Munro; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Automated extraction of auditory brainstem response latencies and amplitudes by means of non-linear curve registration.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Alexander James Hardy; Jessica de Boer
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.