Literature DB >> 22949632

Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia.

Jane Hornickel1, Steven G Zecker, Ann R Bradlow, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Children with dyslexia often exhibit increased variability in sensory and cognitive aspects of hearing relative to typically developing peers. Assistive listening devices (classroom FM systems) may reduce auditory processing variability by enhancing acoustic clarity and attention. We assessed the impact of classroom FM system use for 1 year on auditory neurophysiology and reading skills in children with dyslexia. FM system use reduced the variability of subcortical responses to sound, and this improvement was linked to concomitant increases in reading and phonological awareness. Moreover, response consistency before FM system use predicted gains in phonological awareness. A matched control group of children with dyslexia attending the same schools who did not use the FM system did not show these effects. Assistive listening devices can improve the neural representation of speech and impact reading-related skills by enhancing acoustic clarity and attention, reducing variability in auditory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22949632      PMCID: PMC3478599          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206628109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Auditory processing skills and phonological representation in dyslexic children.

Authors:  Ulla Richardson; Jennifer M Thomson; Sophie K Scott; Usha Goswami
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2004-08

Review 2.  A common framework for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Language-universal sensory deficits in developmental dyslexia: English, Spanish, and Chinese.

Authors:  Usha Goswami; H-L Sharon Wang; Alicia Cruz; Tim Fosker; Natasha Mead; Martina Huss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Auditory brainstem correlates of perceptual timing deficits.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent G Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Test-retest reliability of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Nature of auditory processing disorder in children.

Authors:  David R Moore; Melanie A Ferguson; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; Sonia Ratib; Alison Riley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Florence George; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-09

9.  Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Feng-Ming Tsao; Huei-Mei Liu; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

10.  Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans.

Authors:  M Don; A R Allen; A Starr
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Remote Microphone Technology for Children with Hearing Loss or Auditory Processing Issues.

Authors:  Erin C Schafer; Benjamin Kirby; Sharon Miller
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  Neural stability: A reflection of automaticity in reading.

Authors:  Silvia Siu-Yin Lam; Travis White-Schwoch; Steven G Zecker; Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Music training alters the course of adolescent auditory development.

Authors:  Adam T Tierney; Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Improving neural response to sound improves reading.

Authors:  Paula Tallal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stable auditory processing underlies phonological awareness in typically developing preschoolers.

Authors:  Silvia Bonacina; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Jennifer Krizman; Travis White-Schwoch; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Infant cortical electrophysiology and perception of vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Unstable representation of sound: a biological marker of dyslexia.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Jennifer Krizman; Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.