Literature DB >> 21760513

Methods to eliminate stimulus transduction artifact from insert earphones during electroencephalography.

Tom Campbell1, Jess R Kerlin, Christopher W Bishop, Lee M Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reduce stimulus transduction artifacts in EEG while using insert earphones.
DESIGN: Reference Equivalent Threshold SPLs were assessed for Etymotic ER-4B earphones in 15 volunteers. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and middle latency responses (MLRs)-as well as long-duration complex ABRs-to click and /dα/ speech stimuli were recorded in a single-case design.
RESULTS: Transduction artifacts occurred in raw EEG responses, but they were eliminated by shielding, counter-phasing (averaging across stimuli 180° out of phase), or rereferencing.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical grade ABRs, MLRs, and cABRs can be recorded with a standard digital EEG system and high-fidelity insert earphones, provided one or more techniques are used to remove the stimulus transduction artifact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21760513      PMCID: PMC3214253          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182280353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  27 in total

1.  Reliability of hearing thresholds: computer-automated testing with ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.

Authors:  J A Henry; C L Flick; A Gilbert; R M Ellingson; S A Fausti
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: evidence from token set size effects.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; István Winkler; Teija Kujala; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-12

3.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Ron D Chambers; Nina Kraus And; Ruth M Reeder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Evidence for effects of selective attention in the mid-latency range of the human auditory event-related potential.

Authors:  M Woldorff; J C Hansen; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1987

Review 6.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  R Näätänen; I Winkler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem.

Authors:  T W Picton; D R Stapells; K B Campbell
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1981-08

Review 8.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: scientific review.

Authors:  Bevan Yueh; Nina Shapiro; Catherine H MacLean; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea in human subjects.

Authors:  A Starr; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  31 in total

1.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses reflect familial and cognitive influences.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Deborah Lin; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-01

3.  Reversal of age-related neural timing delays with training.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Sarah Drehobl; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Beat synchronization predicts neural speech encoding and reading readiness in preschoolers.

Authors:  Kali Woodruff Carr; Travis White-Schwoch; Adam T Tierney; Dana L Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.