Literature DB >> 29764783

An Analysis of The Parameters Used In Speech ABR Assessment Protocols.

Milaine D Sanfins1, Stavros Hatzopoulos2, Caroline Donadon1, Thais A Diniz1, Leticia R Borges1, Piotr H Skarzynski3, Maria Francisca Colella-Santos1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the parameters of choice, such as duration, intensity, rate, polarity, number of sweeps, window length, stimulated ear, fundamental frequency, first formant, and second formant, from previously published speech ABR studies. To identify candidate articles, five databases were assessed using the following keyword descriptors: speech ABR, ABR-speech, speech auditory brainstem response, auditory evoked potential to speech, speech-evoked brainstem response, and complex sounds. The search identified 1288 articles published between 2005 and 2015. After filtering the total number of papers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 studies were selected. Analyzing the protocol details used in 21 studies suggested that there is no consensus to date on a speech-ABR protocol and that the parameters of analysis used are quite variable between studies. This inhibits the wider generalization and extrapolation of data across languages and studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29764783      PMCID: PMC6354505          DOI: 10.5152/iao.2018.3574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Adv Otol        ISSN: 1308-7649            Impact factor:   1.017


  35 in total

1.  Meiotic spindle morphogenesis in in vivo and in vitro matured mouse oocytes: insights into the relationship between nuclear and cytoplasmic quality.

Authors:  Alexandra Sanfins; Carlos E Plancha; Eric W Overstrom; David F Albertini
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  On the relationship between speech- and nonspeech-evoked auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  J H Song; K Banai; N M Russo; N Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) characteristics depending on recording conditions, and hearing status: an experimental parametric study.

Authors:  Idrick Akhoun; Annie Moulin; Arnaud Jeanvoine; Mikael Ménard; François Buret; Christian Vollaire; Riccardo Scorretti; Evelyne Veuillet; Christian Berger-Vachon; Lionel Collet; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Brainstem correlates of temporal auditory processing in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Madhavi Basu; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-01-01

Review 5.  Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent G Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The temporal relationship between speech auditory brainstem responses and the acoustic pattern of the phoneme /ba/ in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  I Akhoun; S Gallégo; A Moulin; M Ménard; E Veuillet; C Berger-Vachon; L Collet; H Thai-Van
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Developmental plasticity in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Exploring the relationship between physiological measures of cochlear and brainstem function.

Authors:  S Dhar; R Abel; J Hornickel; T Nicol; E Skoe; W Zhao; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  3 in total

1.  Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Gender Effects on Binaural Speech Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Arzu Kırbac; Meral Didem Turkyılmaz; Süha Yağcıoglu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  A Preliminary Study Characterizing Subcortical and Cortical Auditory Processing and Their Relation to Autistic Traits and Sensory Features.

Authors:  Erin S M Matsuba; Beth A Prieve; Emily Cary; Devon Pacheco; Angela Madrid; Elizabeth McKernan; Elizabeth Kaplan-Kahn; Natalie Russo
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-10-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.