BACKGROUND: Pseudotumors are sterile inflammatory lesions found in the soft tissues surrounding metal-on-metal (MOM) and metal-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasties. In patients with MOM hip arthroplasties, pseudotumors are thought to represent an adverse reaction to metal wear debris. However, the pathogenesis of these lesions remains unclear. Currently, there is inconsistent evidence regarding the influence of adverse cup position and increased wear in the formation of pseudotumors. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined whether pseudotumor formation was associated with (1) adverse cup position, (2) raised metal ion levels, and (3) increased wear rates of the retrieved components. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all 352 patients for whom we had retrieved specimens from revisions of a current-generation MOM hip prosthesis between February 2008 and September 2010; of these, 105 met our inclusion criteria. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to compare acetabular orientation, metal ion levels before revision, and component wear rates between patients with (n = 72) and without (n = 33) pseudotumors, according to findings on metal artifact reduction sequence MRI. RESULTS: The proportion of patients demonstrating evidence of a pseudotumor in well-positioned hips was similar to those with adverse cup positions (67% and 66%, respectively). Patients revised with pseudotumors had similar whole-blood metal ion levels and component wear rates to those who were not revised. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudotumors were not associated with increased wear or metal ion levels, suggesting patient susceptibility is likely to be more important.
BACKGROUND: Pseudotumors are sterile inflammatory lesions found in the soft tissues surrounding metal-on-metal (MOM) and metal-on-polyethylenehip arthroplasties. In patients with MOM hip arthroplasties, pseudotumors are thought to represent an adverse reaction to metal wear debris. However, the pathogenesis of these lesions remains unclear. Currently, there is inconsistent evidence regarding the influence of adverse cup position and increased wear in the formation of pseudotumors. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined whether pseudotumor formation was associated with (1) adverse cup position, (2) raised metal ion levels, and (3) increased wear rates of the retrieved components. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all 352 patients for whom we had retrieved specimens from revisions of a current-generation MOM hip prosthesis between February 2008 and September 2010; of these, 105 met our inclusion criteria. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to compare acetabular orientation, metal ion levels before revision, and component wear rates between patients with (n = 72) and without (n = 33) pseudotumors, according to findings on metal artifact reduction sequence MRI. RESULTS: The proportion of patients demonstrating evidence of a pseudotumor in well-positioned hips was similar to those with adverse cup positions (67% and 66%, respectively). Patients revised with pseudotumors had similar whole-blood metal ion levels and component wear rates to those who were not revised. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudotumors were not associated with increased wear or metal ion levels, suggesting patient susceptibility is likely to be more important.
Authors: Thomas Kalteis; Martin Handel; Thomas Herold; Lars Perlick; Christian Paetzel; Joachim Grifka Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2005-11-11 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Michael M Morlock; Nick Bishop; Jozef Zustin; Michael Hahn; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael Amling Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: William T Long; Manish Dastane; Michael J Harris; Zhinian Wan; Lawrence D Dorr Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Hans-Georg Willert; Gottfried H Buchhorn; Afshin Fayyazi; Renata Flury; Markus Windler; Georg Köster; Christoph H Lohmann Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: A P Toms; T J Marshall; J Cahir; C Darrah; J Nolan; S T Donell; T Barker; J K Tucker Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Br Date: 2008-07
Authors: Rami Madanat; Daniel K Hussey; Gabrielle S Donahue; Hollis G Potter; Robert Wallace; Charles Bragdon; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Martijn F Boomsma; Mireille A Edens; Christiaan P Van Lingen; Niek Warringa; Harmen B Ettema; Cees C P M Verheyen; Mario Maas Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Andrea Lazik; Stefan Landgraeber; Patrick Schulte; Oliver Kraff; Thomas C Lauenstein; Jens M Theysohn Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Jan Philippe Kretzer; Joern Reinders; Robert Sonntag; Sebastien Hagmann; Marcus Streit; Sebastian Jeager; Babak Moradi Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 3.075