Literature DB >> 22090787

High resolution colonoscopy in a bowel cancer screening program improves polyp detection.

Matthew R Banks1, Rehan Haidry, M Adil Butt, Lisa Whitley, Judith Stein, Louise Langmead, Stuart L Bloom, Austin O'Bichere, Sara McCartney, Kalpesh Basherdas, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Laurence B Lovat.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare high resolution colonoscopy (Olympus Lucera) with a megapixel high resolution system (Pentax HiLine) as an in-service evaluation.
METHODS: Polyp detection rates and measures of performance were collected for 269 colonoscopy procedures. Five colonoscopists conducted the study over a three month period, as part of the United Kingdom bowel cancer screening program.
RESULTS: There were no differences in procedure duration (χ² P = 0.98), caecal intubation rates (χ² P = 0.67), or depth of sedation (χ² P = 0.64). Mild discomfort was more common in the Pentax group (χ² P = 0.036). Adenoma detection rate was significantly higher in the Pentax group (χ² test for trend P = 0.01). Most of the extra polyps detected were flat or sessile adenomas.
CONCLUSION: Megapixel definition colonoscopes improve adenoma detection without compromising other measures of endoscope performance. Increased polyp detection rates may improve future outcomes in bowel cancer screening programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel cancer screening; High resolution colonoscopy; Polyp detection

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22090787      PMCID: PMC3214706          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i38.4308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  24 in total

Review 1.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Zoann Nugent; Alain A Demers; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  A quantitative assessment of the risks and cost savings of forgoing histologic examination of diminutive polyps.

Authors:  W R Kessler; T F Imperiale; R W Klein; R C Wielage; D K Rex
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK.

Authors:  B J Rembacken; T Fujii; A Cairns; M F Dixon; S Yoshida; D M Chalmers; A T Axon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prevalence of advanced adenomas in small and diminutive colon polyps using direct measurement of size.

Authors:  Franklin C Tsai; Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

Authors:  D K Rex; C S Cutler; G T Lemmel; E Y Rahmani; D W Clark; D J Helper; G A Lehman; D G Mark
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Robert L Barclay; Joseph J Vicari; Andrea S Doughty; John F Johanson; Roger L Greenlaw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ajay Pabby; Robert E Schoen; Joel L Weissfeld; Randall Burt; James W Kikendall; Peter Lance; Moshe Shike; Elaine Lanza; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer.

Authors:  O Hosokawa; S Shirasaki; Y Kaizaki; H Hayashi; K Douden; M Hattori
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  8 in total

1.  Distribution, size and shape of colorectal adenomas as determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate: Influence of age, sex and colonoscopy indication.

Authors:  Johannes L Klein; Murat Okcu; Karl H Preisegger; Heinz F Hammer
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Comparison of Pentax HiLine and Olympus Lucera systems at screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexey Chernolesskiy; David Swain; James C Lee; Gareth D Corbett; Ewen Ab Cameron
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

Review 3.  What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Authors:  Kelli S Hancock; Ranjan Mascarenhas; David Lieberman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-06

Review 4.  New technologies and techniques to improve adenoma detection in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ashley Bond; Sanchoy Sarkar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-10

5.  Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing standard and high resolution optical technologies in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Simona Di Caro; Lucia Fini; Roser Vega; Konstantinos C Fragkos; Sunil Dolwani; John Green; Lesley-Ann Smith; Conrad Beckett; Ewen Cameron; Matthew Banks
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02-26

Review 6.  Frontiers of robotic endoscopic capsules: a review.

Authors:  Gastone Ciuti; R Caliò; D Camboni; L Neri; F Bianchi; A Arezzo; A Koulaouzidis; S Schostek; D Stoyanov; C M Oddo; B Magnani; A Menciassi; M Morino; M O Schurr; P Dario
Journal:  J Microbio Robot       Date:  2016-05-02

7.  Machine Learning Creates a Simple Endoscopic Classification System that Improves Dysplasia Detection in Barrett's Oesophagus amongst Non-expert Endoscopists.

Authors:  Vinay Sehgal; Avi Rosenfeld; David G Graham; Gideon Lipman; Raf Bisschops; Krish Ragunath; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Marco Novelli; Matthew R Banks; Rehan J Haidry; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Cesare Hassan; Pedro Amaro; Anurag Agrawal; Lene Brink; Wolfgang Fischbach; Matthias Hünger; Rodrigo Jover; Urpo Kinnunen; Akiko Ono; Árpád Patai; Silvia Pecere; Lucio Petruzziello; Jürgen Ferdinand Riemann; Harry Staines; Ann L Stringer; Ervin Toth; Giulio Antonelli; Lorenzo Fuccio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.