Literature DB >> 10770302

Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK.

B J Rembacken1, T Fujii, A Cairns, M F Dixon, S Yoshida, D M Chalmers, A T Axon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flat and depressed colorectal tumours were originally thought to be unique to the Japanese population. Recently there have been reports of flat and depressed lesions in western countries but they have been thought to be uncommon.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 1000 consecutive patients attending for routine colonoscopy were examined for flat or depressed lesions. The examinations were done by one European colonoscopist using methods developed in Japan.
FINDINGS: 321 adenomas were found: 202 (63%) were polypoid, 36% (117) were flat and 2 (0.6%) appeared depressed. Most adenomas contained areas of mild or moderate dysplasia but 10% (31) were severely dysplastic. Six Dukes' A adenocarcinomas were identified together with 25 more advanced adenocarcinomas. The likelihood of Dukes' A cancer or severe dysplasia increased from 4% (3/70) in small flat lesions, to 6% (9/154) in small polyps, 16% (8/50) in larger polyps, 29% (14/49) in large flat lesions, and 75% (3/4) in depressed lesions. 54% (20/37) lesions containing severe dysplasia or Dukes' A carcinoma were flat or depressed.
INTERPRETATION: The polyp-carcinoma hypothesis prompts colonoscopists to search only for polypoid lesions when screening for cancer, and many early colorectal neoplasms may therefore be missed. Colonoscopists require training in the recognition of flat and depressed lesions to detect colorectal tumours in the early stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10770302     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02086-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  110 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Paul Moayyedi; Alex Ford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

Review 2.  Magnification endoscopy, high resolution endoscopy, and chromoscopy; towards a better optical diagnosis.

Authors:  M J Bruno
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy as a screening tool in acromegaly.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; S S Cross; A J Lobo; D S Sanders
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography.

Authors:  H Herfarth; A G Schreyer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Westernisation of gastrointestinal diseases in Asia.

Authors:  J J Y Sung
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Surveillance colonoscopy in ulcerative colitis: magnifying chromoendoscopy in the spotlight.

Authors:  R Kiesslich; M F Neurath
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Sporadic duodenal adenoma and colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  A C Ford; O Rotimi; S M Everett
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study.

Authors:  S Tsuda; B Veress; E Tóth; F-T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

10.  Differences in endoscopic classification of early colorectal carcinoma between China and Japan: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ren-Min Zhu; Fang-Yu Wang; Ichiro Hirata; Ken-Ichi Katsu; Shu-Dong Xiao; Zhong-Lin Yu; Zhi-Hong Zhang; Zhao-Min Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.