Literature DB >> 27403311

Distribution, size and shape of colorectal adenomas as determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate: Influence of age, sex and colonoscopy indication.

Johannes L Klein1, Murat Okcu2, Karl H Preisegger2, Heinz F Hammer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing attention is focused on polyp-related features that may contribute to the operator-dependent nature of colonoscopy. Few data on polyps are available from high-yield colonoscopies, which may serve as a benchmark for quality control.
OBJECTIVES: Describe regional distribution, histology, size and shape of polyps, and the influence of patient age and gender, in colonoscopies performed by a colonoscopist with high lesion detection rate.
METHODS: Analysis of 698 consecutive patients with diagnostic, screening or surveillance colonoscopies.
RESULTS: In 704 colonoscopies, 1908 polyps were removed (360 were protruded and 1548 flat; 1313 were hyperplastic, 562 adenomas, 5 serrated adenomas and 8 mixed). There were 232 adenomas in female patients and 343 in male patients; 39% of the adenomas were protruded and 61% were flat. The peak adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 51% in patients beyond age 79 years. Men older than 49 years had a higher ADR than women. In men and women, respectively: 40% and 32% of adenomas were in the right colon, 31% and 22% were in the transverse colon, and 30% and 47% were in the left colon. Beyond age 59 years, the majority of adenomas were in the proximal colon.
CONCLUSIONS: An excess of adenomas in the proximal colon started at age 60 and this was more pronounced in men than in women. In all colonic regions, the majority of adenomas had a shape that was flat and smaller than 6 mm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma; colon cancer; colonoscopy; detection rate; gender differences; hyperplasia; patient age; polyp; quality control; tumor shape

Year:  2015        PMID: 27403311      PMCID: PMC4924432          DOI: 10.1177/2050640615610266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  33 in total

Review 1.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Can we fix colonoscopy?...Yes!

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Proficiency in the diagnosis of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm yields high adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Tonya Kaltenbach; Sarah K McGill; Venkat Kalidindi; Shai Friedland; Roy Soetikno
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Small colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Rainer Schoefl; Alexander Ziachehabi; Friedrich Wewalka
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.404

5.  Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Shawn S Forbes; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy according to the adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Douglas K Rex; Angelo Zullo; Michal F Kaminski
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Polyps and diverticula of the large intestine: a necropsy survey in Hong Kong.

Authors:  P E Coode; K W Chan; Y T Chan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men.

Authors:  Susan G Coe; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Polyps of the large intestine in Aarhus, Denmark. An autopsy study.

Authors:  L G Johannsen; O Momsen; N O Jacobsen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  6 in total

1.  Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the colon: value of contrast-enhanced CT correlation with colonoscopic findings.

Authors:  Julian Kirchner; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Firas Kour; Lino M Sawicki; Ole Martin; Johannes Bode; Stephan Vom Dahl; Verena Keitel; Dieter Häussinger; Christina Antke; Christian Buchbender; Gerald Antoch; Philipp Heusch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Colonic stasis and chronic constipation: Demystifying proposed risk factors for colon polyp formation in a spinal cord injury veteran population.

Authors:  Jason Colizzo; Jonathan Keshishian; Ambuj Kumar; Gitanjali Vidyarthi; Donald Amodeo
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Variability in, and factors associated with, sizing of polyps by endoscopists at a large community practice.

Authors:  Saleh Elwir; Aasma Shaukat; Michael Shaw; John Hughes; Joshua Colton
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-08-07

Review 4.  Molecular Aspects of Colorectal Adenomas: The Interplay among Microenvironment, Oxidative Stress, and Predisposition.

Authors:  Gitana Maria Aceto; Teresa Catalano; Maria Cristina Curia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Rates of metachronous adenoma after curative resection for left-sided or right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Yuk Fai Lam; Wai Kay Seto; Teresa Tong; Ka Shing Cheung; Oswens Lo; Ivan Fn Hung; Wai Lun Law; Wai K Leung
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-10-10

6.  Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  G Hoff; E Botteri; O Høie; K Garborg; H Wiig; G Huppertz-Hauss; V Moritz; M Bretthauer; Ø Holme
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.