Literature DB >> 21318587

Prevalence of advanced adenomas in small and diminutive colon polyps using direct measurement of size.

Franklin C Tsai1, Williamson B Strum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most studies reporting polyp size use visual estimates. Determining the prevalence of advanced histology based on direct measurement of polyp size may help guide the management of polyps found at optical colonoscopy (OC) and CT colonography (CTC).
METHODS: We designed a large, prospective study to assess the prevalence of advanced adenomas based on direct measurement of polyp size by a certified pathologists' assistant as reported in the pathology report. Patients between 40 and 89 years of age who presented for screening colonoscopy were included in our study. Advanced adenomas were defined as ≥10 mm or ≥25% villous features, high grade dysplasia or cancer. Polyps were divided by size into three groups: diminutive (≤5 mm), small (6-9 mm) and large (≥10 mm). If more than one adenoma was present, the most advanced was used for analysis.
RESULTS: We evaluated 6,905 consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy between January 2005 and December 2006. Of the 4,967 who met the inclusion criteria, the mean age was 58.8 and consisted of 59% women. Overall, 930 (18.7%) had an adenoma; 248 (5%) were advanced adenomas including 8 (0.16%) cancers. Of 89 polyps≥10 mm, 76 (85%) had advanced histology; of 247 polyps 6-9 mm, 67 (27%) were advanced; of 1,025 polyps ≤5 mm, 105 (10%) were advanced. Thus, 172 of 248 (69%) patients with advanced adenomas had small or diminutive adenomas.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate the majority (69%) of advanced adenomas are <10 mm. Even among polyps≤5 mm, there was an appreciable prevalence of advanced adenomas (10%). These findings may help guide the management of sub-centimeter colon polyps found by OC or CTC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21318587     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1598-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  24 in total

1.  The management of small polyps found by virtual colonoscopy: results of a decision analysis.

Authors:  Chin Hur; Daniel C Chung; Robert E Schoen; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance.

Authors:  David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?

Authors:  N Gopalswamy; V N Shenoy; U Choudhry; R J Markert; N Peace; M S Bhutani; C J Barde
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate.

Authors:  R E Schoen; L D Gerber; C Margulies
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on age at diagnosis, anatomic location, and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Matthew Moravec; Jennifer Holub; Leann Michaels; Glenn Eisen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable?

Authors:  M B Fennerty; J Davidson; S S Emerson; R E Sampliner; L J Hixson; H S Garewal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Michael P Chase; Heiko Pohl; Gale S Fiarman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  18 in total

1.  Characteristics of advanced- and non advanced sporadic polypoid colorectal adenomas: correlation to KRAS mutations.

Authors:  Enkh-Amar Yadamsuren; Szilvia Nagy; Laszlo Pajor; Agnes Lacza; Barna Bogner
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Comparative efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon Suk Jung; Chan Hyuk Park; Eunwoo Nam; Chang Soo Eun; Dong Il Park; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on the prevalence of advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy in 4,967 asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Franklin C Tsai; Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Lesions of All Types Exist in Colon Polyps of All Sizes.

Authors:  Kevin O Turner; Robert M Genta; Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using high-definition i-scan: an educational experience.

Authors:  Mariëlle W E Bouwens; Rogier de Ridder; Ad A M Masclee; Ann Driessen; Robert G Riedl; Bjorn Winkens; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Usefulness of a novel calibrated hood to determine indications for colon polypectomy: visual estimation of polyp size is not accurate.

Authors:  Tatsuyuki Watanabe; Keiichiro Kume; Ichiro Yoshikawa; Masaru Harada
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Time trends in quality indicators of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Volker Moritz; Michael Bretthauer; Øyvind Holme; Morten Wang Fagerland; Magnus Løberg; Tom Glomsaker; Thomas de Lange; Birgitte Seip; Per Sandvei; Geir Hoff
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Clinical, endoscopic and pathological characteristics of colorectal polyps in elderly patients: Single-center experience.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Heng Zhang; Shengbin Sun; Manling Huang; Jing Liu; Dan Xu; Min Song; Chenming Sun; Hui Li; Dan Zheng; Yan Fan; Yusheng Liao; Ping Wang; Jie Wu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  High resolution colonoscopy in a bowel cancer screening program improves polyp detection.

Authors:  Matthew R Banks; Rehan Haidry; M Adil Butt; Lisa Whitley; Judith Stein; Louise Langmead; Stuart L Bloom; Austin O'Bichere; Sara McCartney; Kalpesh Basherdas; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer in Persons under 50 Years of Age: A Review.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum; C Richard Boland
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.