Literature DB >> 26265990

New technologies and techniques to improve adenoma detection in colonoscopy.

Ashley Bond1, Sanchoy Sarkar1.   

Abstract

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key component of colonoscopy quality assessment, with a direct link between itself and future mortality from colorectal cancer. There are a number of potential factors, both modifiable and non-modifiable that can impact upon ADR. As methods, understanding and technologies advance, so should our ability to improve ADRs, and thus, reduce colorectal cancer mortality. This article will review new technologies and techniques that improve ADR, both in terms of the endoscopes themselves and adjuncts to current systems. In particular it focuses on effective techniques and behaviours, developments in image enhancement, advancement in endoscope design and developments in accessories that may improve ADR. It also highlights the key role that continued medical education plays in improving the quality of colonoscopy and thus ADR. The review aims to present a balanced summary of the evidence currently available and does not propose to serve as a guideline.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma detection; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; New technology; Techniques

Year:  2015        PMID: 26265990      PMCID: PMC4530330          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i10.969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  71 in total

1.  Computer-based classification of small colorectal polyps by using narrow-band imaging with optical magnification.

Authors:  Sebastian Gross; Christian Trautwein; Alexander Behrens; Ron Winograd; Stephan Palm; Holger H Lutz; Ramin Schirin-Sokhan; Hartmut Hecker; Til Aach; Jens J W Tischendorf
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Autofluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song; Subhas Banerjee; David Desilets; David L Diehl; Francis A Farraye; Vivek Kaul; Sripathi R Kethu; Richard S Kwon; Petar Mamula; Marcos C Pedrosa; Sarah A Rodriguez; William M Tierney
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  [Sedation used during colonoscopies at the Peruvian-Japanese policlinic. Their relationship with quality indicators].

Authors:  Víctor Parra; José Watanabe; Augusto Nago; Magdalena Astete; Carlos Rodríguez; Guillermo Valladares; Nora Nuñez; Max Yoza; Tallulah Gargurevich; Juan Pinto
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Peru       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

4.  A new method for screening and surveillance colonoscopy: Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew W Yen; Joseph W Leung; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

5.  Hyoscine for polyp detection during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Imran Ashraf; Sohail Ashraf; Sameer Siddique; Douglas L Nguyen; Abhishek Choudhary; Matthew L Bechtold
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-11-16

6.  Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon.

Authors:  R Kiesslich; M von Bergh; M Hahn; G Hermann; M Jung
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Methylene blue MMX tablets for chromoendoscopy. Safety tolerability and bioavailability in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Repici; A F D Di Stefano; M M Radicioni; V Jas; L Moro; S Danese
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Subramanian; J Mannath; C J Hawkey; K Ragunath
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 9.  Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Aleksandar Nagorni; Goran Bjelakovic; Bratislav Petrovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

10.  Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Xiaodong Liu; Hui Luo; Lin Zhang; Felix W Leung; Zhiguo Liu; Xiangping Wang; Rui Huang; Na Hui; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  5 in total

1.  The advantage of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution combined with lactulose in patients with long interval preparation-to-colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hu Yuanchao; Li Xueping; Lin Tao; Niu Jianping; Mi Man
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gregor Urban; Priyam Tripathi; Talal Alkayali; Mohit Mittal; Farid Jalali; William Karnes; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Authors:  Kelli S Hancock; Ranjan Mascarenhas; David Lieberman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-06

4.  Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.

Authors:  Carla G Abou Fadel; Rani H Shayto; Ala I Sharara
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03

5.  Outcomes and adverse factors for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal polyps in elderly patients.

Authors:  Thomas Skouras; Ashley Bond; Asimina Gaglia; Laura Bonnett; Meng Jiang Lim; Sanchoy Sarkar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.