Literature DB >> 20877348

Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study.

Harminder Singh1, Zoann Nugent, Alain A Demers, Charles N Bernstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many of the colorectal cancers (CRCs) diagnosed within 3 years after a colonoscopy are likely because of lesions missed on the initial colonoscopy. In this population-based study, we investigated the rate and predictors of CRCs diagnosed within 3 years of a colonoscopy.
METHODS: We identified individuals 50-80 years of age diagnosed with CRC between 1992 and 2008 from the provincewide Manitoba Cancer Registry. Performance of colonoscopy and history of co-morbidities was determined by linkage to the provincial universal health care insurance provider's physician billing claims and hospital discharges databases. CRCs diagnosed within 6 months of a colonoscopy were categorized as detected CRCs and those 6-36 months after a colonoscopy as early/missed CRCs. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the patient, endoscopist, colonoscopy, and CRC factors associated with early/missed CRCs.
RESULTS: Of the 4,883 CRCs included in the study, 388 (7.9%) were early/missed CRCs, with a range of 4.5% of rectum/rectosigmoid cancers in men to 14.4% of transverse colon/splenic flexure cancers in women. Independent risk factors associated with early/missed CRCs included prior colonoscopy, performance of index colonoscopy by family physicians, recent year of CRC diagnosis, and proximal site of CRC.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that approximately 1 in 13 CRCs may be an early/missed CRC, diagnosed after an index colonoscopy in usual clinical practice. Women are more likely to have early/missed CRC. It is unclear if this relates to differences in procedure difficulty, bowel preparation issues, or tumor biology between men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20877348     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  86 in total

Review 1.  Mutation and epigenetic molecular clocks in cancer.

Authors:  Darryl Shibata
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 2.  Achieving competence in colonoscopy: Milestones and the need for a new endoscopic curriculum in gastroenterology training.

Authors:  Sara B Stanford; Stephanie Lee; Candace Masaquel; Robert H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10

3.  Quality of Colonoscopy Performed in Rural Practice: Experience From the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative and the Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Jennifer L Holub; Cynthia Morris; Lyle J Fagnan; Judith R Logan; LeAnn C Michaels; David A Lieberman
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance.

Authors:  Ju Seok Kim; Sun Hyung Kang; Hee Seok Moon; Eaum Seok Lee; Seok Hyun Kim; Jae Kyu Sung; Byung Seok Lee; Hyun Yong Jeong; Woo Suk Chung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Low rate of large polyps (>9 mm) within 10 years after an adequate baseline colonoscopy with no polyps.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Cynthia D Morris; Judith Logan; J Lucas Williams; Patricia Carney
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Canadian guidelines for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jennifer J Telford
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Quality colonoscopy: a matter of time, technique or technology?

Authors:  Robert H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Interval cancers after colonoscopy-insights and recommendations.

Authors:  Silvia Sanduleanu; Ad M Masclee; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Administrative Database Research Overestimates the Rate of Interval Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Gotfried; Marc Bernstein; Adam C Ehrlich; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Patient comfort and quality in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Kevin Dowler; Roland M Valori; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.