Literature DB >> 27098814

What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Kelli S Hancock1, Ranjan Mascarenhas1, David Lieberman2.   

Abstract

In the USA, colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer death among both men and women. Declining rates of colon cancer in the past decade have been attributed in part to screening and removal of precancerous polyps via colonoscopy. Recent emphasis has been placed on measures to increase the quality and effectiveness of colonoscopy. These have been divided into pre-procedure quality metrics (bowel preparation), procedural quality metrics (cecal intubation, withdrawal time, and adenoma detection rate), post-procedure metrics (surveillance interval), and other quality metrics (patient satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure). The purpose of this article is to review the data and controversies surrounding each of these and identify ways to optimize the performance of colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma detection rate; Bowel prep; Colonoscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098814     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-016-0500-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  63 in total

1.  Computer-based classification of small colorectal polyps by using narrow-band imaging with optical magnification.

Authors:  Sebastian Gross; Christian Trautwein; Alexander Behrens; Ron Winograd; Stephan Palm; Holger H Lutz; Ramin Schirin-Sokhan; Hartmut Hecker; Til Aach; Jens J W Tischendorf
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Rakhi Kheraj; Arjun Bhansali; Hanako Yamanaka; Naama Neeman; Sunil Sheth; Mandeep Sawhney; J Thomas Lamont; Mark D Aronson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Hyoscine for polyp detection during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Imran Ashraf; Sohail Ashraf; Sameer Siddique; Douglas L Nguyen; Abhishek Choudhary; Matthew L Bechtold
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-11-16

5.  Methylene blue MMX tablets for chromoendoscopy. Safety tolerability and bioavailability in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Repici; A F D Di Stefano; M M Radicioni; V Jas; L Moro; S Danese
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Effect of hyoscine N-butylbromide on adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Mohammad F Madhoun; Tauseef Ali; William M Tierney; John T Maple
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 7.559

7.  High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Subramanian; J Mannath; C J Hawkey; K Ragunath
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Kenneth P Batts; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; John R Goldblum; José G Guillem; Charles J Kahi; Matthew F Kalady; Michael J O'Brien; Robert D Odze; Shuji Ogino; Susan Parry; Dale C Snover; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul E Wise; Joanne Young; James Church
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats.

Authors:  Hendrikus Jm Pullens; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-16

10.  Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video.

Authors:  Sateesh Reddy Prakash; Siddharth Verma; John McGowan; Betsy E Smith; Anjali Shroff; Gregory H Gibson; Michael Cheng; Douglas Lowe Ii; Kavitha Gopal; Smruti R Mohanty
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.522

View more
  3 in total

1.  Adenoma miss rate of polypectomy-referring hospitals is high in Korea.

Authors:  Ju Hyun Seo; Bo-In Lee; Kyungjin Lee; Jae Myung Park; Jin Soo Kim; Young-Seok Cho; Kang-Moon Lee; Sang Woo Kim; Hwang Choi; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.884

2.  Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study.

Authors:  Ji Young Chang; Chang Mo Moon; Hyun Jung Lee; Hyo-Joon Yang; Yunho Jung; Sang Wook Kim; Sung-Ae Jung; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A short telephone-call reminder improves bowel preparation, quality indicators and patient satisfaction with first colonoscopy.

Authors:  Marisol Gálvez; Angel Mario Zarate; Hector Espino; Fátima Higuera-de la Tijera; Richard Alexander Awad; Santiago Camacho
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-11-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.