Literature DB >> 21992367

Skin dose mapping for fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Perry B Johnson1, David Borrego, Stephen Balter, Kevin Johnson, Daniel Siragusa, Wesley E Bolch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To introduce a new skin dose mapping software system for interventional fluoroscopy dose assessment and to analyze the benefits and limitations of patient-phantom matching.
METHODS: In this study, a new software system was developed for visualizing patient skin dose during interventional fluoroscopy procedures. The system works by translating the reference point air kerma to the location of the patient's skin, which is represented by a computational model. In order to orient the model with the x-ray source, geometric parameters found within the radiation dose structured report (RDSR) are used along with a limited number of in-clinic measurements. The output of the system is a visual indication of skin dose mapped onto an anthropomorphic model at a resolution of 5 mm. In order to determine if patient-dependent and patient-sculpted models increase accuracy, peak skin dose was calculated for each of 26 patient-specific models and compared with doses calculated using an elliptical stylized model, a reference hybrid model, a matched patient-dependent model and one patient-sculpted model. Results were analyzed in terms of a percent difference using the doses calculated using the patient-specific model as the true standard.
RESULTS: Anthropometric matching, including the use of both patient-dependent and patient-sculpted phantoms, was shown most beneficial for left lateral and anterior-posterior projections. In these cases, the percent difference using a reference model was between 8 and 20%, using a patient-dependent model between 7 and 15%, and using a patient-sculpted model between 3 and 7%. Under the table tube configurations produced errors less than 5% in most situations due to the flattening affects of the table and pad, and the fact that table height is the main determination of source-to-skin distance for these configurations. In addition to these results, several skin dose maps were produced and a prototype display system was placed on the in-clinic monitor of an interventional fluoroscopy system.
CONCLUSIONS: The skin dose mapping program developed in this work represents a new tool that, as the RDSR becomes available through automated export or real-time streaming, can provide the interventional physician information needed to modify behavior when clinically appropriate. The program is nonproprietary and transferable, and also functions independent to the software systems already installed on the control room workstation. The next step will be clinical implementation where the workflow will be optimized along with further analysis of real-time capabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21992367      PMCID: PMC3195372          DOI: 10.1118/1.3633935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Mass-energy absorption coefficient and backscatter factor ratios for kilovoltage x-ray beams.

Authors:  C M Ma; J P Seuntjens
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Electronic products; performance standard for diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2005-06-10

3.  Patient dosimetry for x rays used in medical imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2005-12

4.  [Medical electrical equipment - part 2-43: particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures].

Authors:  Hiroyuki Miyake Et Al
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2011

5.  Real-time quantification and display of skin radiation during coronary angiography and intervention.

Authors:  A den Boer; P J de Feijter; P W Serruys; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The impact of anthropometric patient-phantom matching on organ dose: a hybrid phantom study for fluoroscopy guided interventions.

Authors:  Perry B Johnson; Amy Geyer; David Borrego; Kayla Ficarrotta; Kevin Johnson; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Automatic monitoring of localized skin dose with fluoroscopic and interventional procedures.

Authors:  Yasaman Khodadadegan; Muhong Zhang; William Pavlicek; Robert G Paden; Brian Chong; Beth A Schueler; Kenneth A Fetterly; Steve G Langer; Teresa Wu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Daniel Lodwick; Jorge Hurtado; Deanna Pafundi; Jonathan L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair.

Authors:  Stephen Balter; John W Hopewell; Donald L Miller; Louis K Wagner; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Methods for measuring fluoroscopic skin dose.

Authors:  Stephen Balter
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09
View more
  18 in total

1.  Monitoring neurointerventional radiation doses using dose-tracking software: implications for the establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.

Authors:  Holly Acton; Karl James; Richard G Kavanagh; Colm O'Tuathaigh; Deirdre Moloney; Gerald Wyse; Noel Fanning; Michael Maher; Owen J O'Connor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Real-time eye lens dose monitoring during cerebral angiography procedures.

Authors:  M J Safari; J H D Wong; K A A Kadir; N K Thorpe; D L Cutajar; M Petasecca; M L F Lerch; A B Rosenfeld; K H Ng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

4.  Calculation of the entrance skin dose distribution for fluoroscopically guided interventions using a pencil beam backscatter model.

Authors:  Sarath Vijayan; Zhenyu Xiong; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

5.  Effectiveness of a novel real-time dosimeter in interventional radiology: a comparison of new and old radiation sensors.

Authors:  Yohei Inaba; Masaaki Nakamura; Koichi Chida; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-10-10

6.  A new method of real-time skin dose visualization. Clinical evaluation of fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Authors:  Fazel Boujan; Nicolas Clauss; Emilie Santos; Sjirk Boon; Gerard Schouten; Luc Mertz; Jean-Louis Dietemann
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  A tracking system to calculate patient skin dose in real-time during neurointerventional procedures using a biplane x-ray imaging system.

Authors:  V K Rana; S Rudin; D R Bednarek
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A machine learning pipeline for internal anatomical landmark embedding based on a patient surface model.

Authors:  Xia Zhong; Norbert Strobel; Annette Birkhold; Markus Kowarschik; Rebecca Fahrig; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 9.  Patient radiation dose in percutaneous biliary interventions: recommendations for DRLs on the basis of a multicentre study.

Authors:  Daniel Schmitz; Thomas Vogl; Nour-Eldin Abdelrehim Nour-Eldin; Boris Radeleff; Jens-Christian Kröger; Andreas H Mahnken; Harald Ittrich; Hans-Björn Gehl; Bernd Plessow; Joachim Böttcher; Josef Tacke; Markus Wispler; Ulrich Rosien; Wolfgang Schorr; Markus Joerdens; Nicolas Glaser; Erik-Sebastian Fuchs; Andrea Tal; Bettina Friesenhahn-Ochs; Thomas Leimbach; Lars Höpner; Marko Weber; Stefan Gölder; Michael Böhmig; Svetlana Hetjens; Jochen Rudi; Alexander Schegerer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Organ doses in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac-centered fluoroscopically guided interventions: Comparison of three methods for computational phantom alignment.

Authors:  Emily L Marshall; David Borrego; James C Fudge; Dhanashree Rajderkar; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.