Literature DB >> 11591614

Real-time quantification and display of skin radiation during coronary angiography and intervention.

A den Boer1, P J de Feijter, P W Serruys, J R Roelandt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiographically guided investigations may be associated with excessive radiation exposure, which may cause skin injuries. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a system that measures in real time the dose applied to each 1-cm(2) area of skin, taking into account the movement of the x-ray source and changes in the beam characteristics. The goal of such a system is to help prevent high doses that might cause skin injury. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The entrance point, beam size, and dose at the skin of the patient were calculated by use of the geometrical settings of gantry, investigation table, and x-ray beam and an ionization chamber. The data are displayed graphically. Three hundred twenty-two sequential cardiac investigations in adult patients were analyzed. The mean peak entrance dose per investigation was 0.475 Gy to a mean skin area of 8.2 cm(2). The cumulative KERMA-area product per investigation was 52.2 Gy/cm(2) (25.4 to 99.2 Gy/cm(2)), and the mean entrance beam size at the skin was 49.2 cm(2). Twenty-eight percent of the patients (90/322) received a maximum dose of <1 Gy to a small skin area ( approximately 6 cm(2)), and 13.5% of the patients (42/322) received a maximum dose of >2 Gy.
CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of the dose distribution at the skin will alert the operator to the development of high-dose areas; by use of other gantry settings with nonoverlapping entrance fields, different generator settings, and extra collimation, skin lesion can be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591614     DOI: 10.1161/hc4001.097057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  14 in total

1.  Skin dose mapping for fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Authors:  Perry B Johnson; David Borrego; Stephen Balter; Kevin Johnson; Daniel Siragusa; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology.

Authors:  E Kuon; J Birkel; M Schmitt; J B Dahm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.

Authors:  E Kuon; J B Dahm; D M Robinson; K Empen; M Günther; W Wucherer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-10

4.  Calibration of GafChromic XR-RV3 radiochromic film for skin dose measurement using standardized x-ray spectra and a commercial flatbed scanner.

Authors:  Bradley P McCabe; Michael A Speidel; Tina L Pike; Michael S Van Lysel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Reference air kerma and kerma-area product as estimators of peak skin dose for fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Authors:  Deukwoo Kwon; Mark P Little; Donald L Miller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Patient radiation dose in percutaneous biliary interventions: recommendations for DRLs on the basis of a multicentre study.

Authors:  Daniel Schmitz; Thomas Vogl; Nour-Eldin Abdelrehim Nour-Eldin; Boris Radeleff; Jens-Christian Kröger; Andreas H Mahnken; Harald Ittrich; Hans-Björn Gehl; Bernd Plessow; Joachim Böttcher; Josef Tacke; Markus Wispler; Ulrich Rosien; Wolfgang Schorr; Markus Joerdens; Nicolas Glaser; Erik-Sebastian Fuchs; Andrea Tal; Bettina Friesenhahn-Ochs; Thomas Leimbach; Lars Höpner; Marko Weber; Stefan Gölder; Michael Böhmig; Svetlana Hetjens; Jochen Rudi; Alexander Schegerer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Radiation dose to the brain and subsequent risk of developing brain tumors in pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures.

Authors:  I Thierry-Chef; S L Simon; C E Land; D L Miller
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Organ doses in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac-centered fluoroscopically guided interventions: Comparison of three methods for computational phantom alignment.

Authors:  Emily L Marshall; David Borrego; James C Fudge; Dhanashree Rajderkar; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's role in improving radiation dose management for medical X-ray imaging devices.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Smita Kakar; Lu Jiang; David C Spelic; Laurel Burk
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 10.  Methods for measuring fluoroscopic skin dose.

Authors:  Stephen Balter
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.