Literature DB >> 21877777

Binaural benefit for speech recognition with spectral mismatch across ears in simulated electric hearing.

Yang-soo Yoon1, Aiguo Liu, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of binaural spectral mismatch on binaural benefits in the context of bilateral cochlear implants using acoustic simulations. Binaural spectral mismatch was systematically manipulated by simulating changes in the relative insertion depths across ears. Sentence recognition, presented unilaterally and bilaterally, were measured in normal-hearing listeners in quiet and noise at +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Significant binaural benefits were observed when the interaural difference in insertion depth was 1 mm or less. This result suggests a dependence of the binaural benefit on redundant speech information, rather than on similarity in performance across ears.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21877777      PMCID: PMC3155583          DOI: 10.1121/1.3606460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.

Authors:  Deniz Baskent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-28

3.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Olivier Sterkers; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Benoit Godey; Alain Robier; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse; Philippe Bordure; Michel Mondain; Didier Bouccara; Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Stéphanie Borel; Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Evelyne Ferrary
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The relationship between binaural benefit and difference in unilateral speech recognition performance for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; Yongxin Li; Hou-Yong Kang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Carol Sammeth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Resistance to learning binaurally mismatched frequency-to-place maps: implications for bilateral stimulation with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Catherine M Siciliano; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Katharine Mair
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Self-Selection of Frequency Tables with Bilateral Mismatches in an Acoustic Simulation of a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Ksenia Prosolovich; Chin-Tuan Tan; E Katelyn Glassman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Matthew J Goupell; Nathaniel J Spencer; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Bimodal benefit depends on the performance difference between a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Jae-Sook Gho; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-10-20

6.  Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Binaural benefit with and without a bilateral spectral mismatch in acoustic simulations of cochlear implant processing.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  The Temporal Limits Encoder as a Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Qinglin Meng
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.