Literature DB >> 20868733

Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Tianhao Li1, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

The present study used eight normal-hearing (NH) subjects, listening to acoustic cochlear implant (CI) simulations, to examine the effects of spectral shifting on speech recognition in noise. Speech recognition was measured using spectrally matched and shifted speech (vowels, consonants, and IEEE sentences), generated by 8-channel, sine-wave vocoder. Measurements were made in quiet and in noise (speech-shaped static noise and speech-babble at 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio). One spectral match condition and four spectral shift conditions were investigated: 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm linear shift, and 3 mm shift with compression, in terms of cochlear distance. Results showed that speech recognition scores dropped because of noise and spectral shifting, and that the interactive effects of spectral shifting and background conditions depended on the degree/type of spectral shift, background conditions, and the speech test materials. There was no significant interaction between spectral shifting and two noise conditions for all speech test materials. However, significant interactions between linear spectral shifts and all background conditions were found in sentence recognition; significant interactions between spectral shift types and all background conditions were found in vowel recognition. Overall, the results suggest that tonotopic mismatch may affect performance of CI users in complex listening environments.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868733      PMCID: PMC3001342          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  41 in total

1.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.

Authors:  Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.

Authors:  Deniz Baskent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map.

Authors:  M A Svirsky; A Silveira; H Neuburger; Su-Wooi Teoh; H Suárez
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.

Authors:  D J Van Tasell; S D Soli; V M Kirby; G P Widin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli.

Authors:  G F Smoorenburg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  18 in total

1.  Binaural benefit for speech recognition with spectral mismatch across ears in simulated electric hearing.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; Aiguo Liu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Lori L Holt; Patryk Laurent; Sung-Joo Lim; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Determining the minimum number of electrodes that need to be pitch matched to accurately estimate pitch matches across the array.

Authors:  Julia Stelmach; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Voice conversion in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Eric P Wilkinson; Ossama Abdel-Hamid; John J Galvin; Hui Jiang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Maja Svrakic; J Thomas Roland; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  The effect of enhancing temporal periodicity cues on Cantonese tone recognition by cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Tan Lee; Shing Yu; Meng Yuan; Terence Ka Cheong Wong; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Comparison of Speech Recognition With an Organ of Corti Versus Spiral Ganglion Frequency-to-Place Function in Place-Based Mapping of Cochlear Implant and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.