Literature DB >> 8132899

Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.

R Drullman1, J M Festen, R Plomp.   

Abstract

The effect of smearing the temporal envelope on the speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences in noise and on phoneme identification was investigated for normal-hearing listeners. For this purpose, the speech signal was split up into a series of frequency bands (width of 1/4, 1/2, or 1 oct) and the amplitude envelope for each band was low-pass filtered at cutoff frequencies of 0, 1/2, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, or 64 Hz. Results for 36 subjects show (1) a severe reduction in sentence intelligibility for narrow processing bands at low cutoff frequencies (0-2 Hz); and (2) a marginal contribution of modulation frequencies above 16 Hz to the intelligibility of sentences (provided that lower modulation frequencies are completely present). For cutoff frequencies above 4 Hz, the SRT appears to be independent of the frequency bandwidth upon which envelope filtering takes place. Vowel and consonant identification with nonsense syllables were studied for cutoff frequencies of 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16 Hz in 1/4-oct bands. Results for 24 subjects indicate that consonants are more affected than vowels. Errors in vowel identification mainly consist of reduced recognition of diphthongs and of confusions between long and short vowels. In case of consonant recognition, stops appear to suffer most, with confusion patterns depending on the position in the syllable (initial, medial, or final).

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8132899     DOI: 10.1121/1.408467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  177 in total

1.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A possible role for a paralemniscal auditory pathway in the coding of slow temporal information.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Learning and generalization of auditory temporal-interval discrimination in humans.

Authors:  B A Wright; D V Buonomano; H W Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yuhjung Tsai; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Kamil K Wójcicki; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals.

Authors:  Miika Koskinen; Jaakko Viinikanoja; Mikko Kurimo; Arto Klami; Samuel Kaski; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Perceptuo-motor interactions in the perceptual organization of speech: evidence from the verbal transformation effect.

Authors:  Anahita Basirat; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Marc Sato
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Ability of primary auditory cortical neurons to detect amplitude modulation with rate and temporal codes: neurometric analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Pingbo Yin; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Alan Wiinberg; Johannes Zaar; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.