Literature DB >> 17131213

Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.

Tianhao Li1, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

Although normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear implant (CI) listeners are able to adapt to spectrally shifted speech to some degree, auditory training has been shown to provide more complete and/or accelerated adaptation. However, it is unclear whether listeners use auditory and visual feedback to improve discrimination of speech stimuli, or to learn the identity of speech stimuli. The present study investigated the effects of training with lexical and nonlexical labels on NH listeners' perceptual adaptation to spectrally degraded and spectrally shifted vowels. An eight-channel sine wave vocoder was used to simulate CI speech processing. Two degrees of spectral shift (moderate and severe shift) were studied with three training paradigms, including training with lexical labels (i.e., "hayed," "had," "who'd," etc.), training with nonlexical labels (i.e., randomly assigned letters "f," "b," "g," etc.), and repeated testing with lexical labels (i.e., "test-only" paradigm without feedback). All training and testing was conducted over 5 consecutive days, with two to four training exercises per day. Results showed that with the test-only paradigm, lexically labeled vowel recognition significantly improved for moderately shifted vowels; however, there was no significant improvement for severely shifted vowels. Training with nonlexical labels significantly improved the recognition of nonlexically labeled vowels for both shift conditions; however, this improvement failed to generalize to lexically labeled vowel recognition with severely shifted vowels. Training with lexical labels significantly improved lexically labeled vowel recognition with severely shifted vowels. These results suggest that storage and retrieval of speech patterns in the central nervous system is somewhat robust to tonotopic distortion and spectral degradation. Although training with nonlexical labels may improve discrimination of spectrally distorted peripheral patterns, lexically meaningful feedback is needed to identify these peripheral patterns. The results also suggest that training with lexically meaningful feedback may be beneficial to CI users, especially patients with shallow electrode insertion depths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17131213      PMCID: PMC2538416          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0059-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  15 in total

1.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Perceptual training: a tool for both modifying the brain and exploring it.

Authors:  M Ahissar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Adaptation by a cochlear-implant patient to upward shifts in the frequency representation of speech.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Darlene Ketten
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  D R Ketten; M W Skinner; G Wang; M W Vannier; G A Gates; J G Neely
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1998-11

10.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; L A Getty; M J Clark; K Wheeler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A model of incomplete adaptation to a severely shifted frequency-to-electrode mapping by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-23

3.  Binaural benefit for speech recognition with spectral mismatch across ears in simulated electric hearing.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; Aiguo Liu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Lori L Holt; Patryk Laurent; Sung-Joo Lim; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Adaptive plasticity in speech perception: Effects of external information and internal predictions.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Julie A Fiez; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Sandra I Oba; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Virginia D Driscoll; Jacob Oleson; Dingfeng Jiang; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Neural correlates of adaptation in freely-moving normal hearing subjects under cochlear implant acoustic simulations.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Thomas M Talavage; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.